The analysis of the contested phases by Lanois: “No penalty for AEK and Panathinaikos”!

Justifies the referees in Agrinio and OAKA o Stéphane Lanois!

In the established video of the disputed phases, the French referee stands by the two penalty cases, for which AEK shouts in the game with Panaitolikos and of course in the case of Retsu, for which Panathinaikos shouts in the derby with Olympiakos, and emphasizes that that’s right, all three were not given the final sentence! We remind you, the two Athenian teams issued announcements on the occasion of the arbitration, with the “Union” speaking of “unprecedented alteration of result»asking for the exemplary punishment of the referees and the “greens” to emphasize on Sunday night (06/10) that “those who treat Panathinaikos and its world like this should be ashamed”, emphasizing that Retsu’s phase is “the definition of penalty»!

THE Stéphane Lanoishowever, has a different opinion. Specifically, for the two phases in Agrinio, he emphasizes that Pereira has started to fall before there was contact with the goalkeeper of Panaitolikos and that the Argentine goes to take the penalty and to make contact, while in relation to Luis’ hand he mentions that the ball goes into his hand after a tackle on a teammate and that he has no intention of playing the handso there is no penalty here either.

In the derby now, and regarding Retsu’s phase, he notes: “In this case the defender is between the attacker and the goalkeeper. He jumps with his hand in a natural position, they claim the ball after the attacker heads back. Short distance, natural hand movement, no ability to avoid contact. The game must go on».

From there on the French referee stands at penalty, won by Levadeiakos against PAOK, stressing that the match referee correctly showed the white arrow, as there is an infringement, while regarding the match in Peristeri between Atromitos and Volos he saw serious mistakes by Tasos Sidiropoulos.

Watch the video with its analysis: