The coach of the podium: The problem in the midfield, the static phases and the matte movements of Lutsescu

A historic night for him PAOKwho -doubled his victories over her Ghent– celebrated his qualification to the “8” of the Europa Conference League!

The Thessalonians accepted great pressure at intervals, due to their poor presence χαφ their. However, taking advantage of them static phases and in combination with his movements Rasvan Lucescu from the bench they reached the great “double”.

In detail, the key points from PAOK’s great victory in Belgium:

* The problem in the midfield, the pressure of Ghent and the fillings:

PAOK did not start the game well at all, as had happened to a lesser extent in the Toumba match. The truth is that the Thessalonians they were waiting for the big pressure. In this sense, their poor inhibitory function, which is due to minimal help given by the midfielders to the defensive quartet. Especially the Biseswar left many gaps on the left, with the result that Vierinia suffered it, which was left exposed in many cases.

The guests balanced at several intervals, however the “big picture” wanted the Belgians to create supernumerariesload the opponent’s area and operate comfortably fillings/shooting. One of them brought the goal to 40 ‘, while they could have scored in other phases in this way. Definitely came out to the coach of Ghent, Hein Vanhazenburgthe use of system-“mirror” that of PAOK (namely the 4-2-3-1 instead of 3-4-2-1 he had in the first race), hitting better from the sidelines. A move that apparently was not expected by Rasvan Lucescu.

* The inability to hold the ball:

PAOK’s goal was clear from the beginning of the match: Manage the score of the first fight and take advantage of any opportunities that would arise ahead. The great responsibility of those who played in the positions (defensive and creative) of the midfield lies beyond the suspensive function and in not holding the ball. Of course, their absences were also important Kurtic and Andrija Zivkovic. Especially the second in the counterattack, which was not used.

* The utilization of the static phases:

Apart from everything else, history will write that PAOK got two victories against Ghent with three goals from static phases. Agreed, in the direct execution of Kurtic in the 1-0 of Toumba the ball countered, while in the 0-1 of the match of Belgium the phase after the execution of the corner has progressed relatively until Crespo scores.

Nevertheless, the essence is that PAOK is working on them! Something that looked the best in 77 ‘, in a phase taken from training: Vierinia committed the foul, finding Augusto who made the move at the height of the large area, from where he caught a one-piece shooter that ended up in the lower right corner. In fact, the “biceps of the North” showed improvement in this part in relation to the first match, where he left unused similar cases.

* The coexistence of four backs after the entry of Sidley and Taylor:

Matte movements in the development of the match were undoubtedly their entry Cindley (57 ‘) and Taylor (70 ‘) instead of Biseswar and Murg, respectively. The two PAOK players played in the positions of the players they replaced (left and right in the midfield), with Rasvan Lucescu continuing in the match with four backs (given the… leadership refusal of Vierinias to leave despite his battered head)! These two changes came to the Romanian coach, especially Sindklay. The 28-year-old ace helped so inhibitoryas well as aggressively after offering what was missing from his team: The holding the ballwhich was also expressed by several races.

Follow News Bulletin 247 on Google News to be the first to hear the latest news .