In the analysis of four controversial phases of its 23rd race Stoiximan Super League Paulo Valerie proceeded on behalf of KED.
Var manager stood in the penalty shootout that the Olympic In the match with Panserraic (with the game 0-0), referring to a clear infringement of Petavrakis. It is recalled that Katsikas rejected the execution of El Kabi who scored in the course of the phase.
In addition, the Italian points out that Funa had to be eliminated in the match with Astera Aktor and the Baba goal in PAOK-Lamia was rightly canceled. In addition, he says that the Panetolian -athens Kallithea was held in a winning corner kick, which begins before the static phase was executed. “In this case there is no clear proof that the corner had already been executed, so the VAR cannot intervene. If the corner had already been executed we would expect a penalty shootout and VAR intervention“, Valerie points out.
However, for AEK-Atromitos, for which a lot of talk was made, with the hosts of express complaints about four penaltiesbut also the guests to speak of a penalty shoot -out Shortly before the expiration on Van Weert with the match at 1-0, there was no KED analysis.
Source: Sport Fm
I am currently a news writer for News Bulletin247 where I mostly cover sports news. I have always been interested in writing and it is something I am very passionate about. In my spare time, I enjoy reading and spending time with my family and friends.
