A proposal is not justified, as the United States continues to use firearms after horrific shootings.
Earlier this month, Axon, the company best known for developing teasers, suggested that drones could be the answer.
The company has developed the idea of a small drone with a teaser that can be used to nullify enemy archers.
In the wake of the tragedy in Texas, the company’s CEO, Rick Smith, announced these plans and stated that drones could be installed in schools.
“It’s time to make this technology a reality, and we’re starting a powerful public debate about how to ethically introduce UAVs into schools,” he said.
Smith appears to have made that statement, even though the company’s institutional review board had previously said so. horrible idea.
In fact, the council helped develop the drone eight to four weeks before Uval was fired.
Following Smith’s public comments, nine members of the Ethics Council have decided to resign.
“We don’t want it to go that far,” the statement said. “Each of us joined the board, believing we could influence the direction of the company in a way that would help mitigate the harm caused by law enforcement technology and better enjoy the benefits.”
Outgoing company members said they “lost confidence in Axon’s ability to be a responsible partner.”
Discomfort caused by Smith’s view that non-lethal armed drones are a means of blocking active fire situations has been so intense that he has since withdrawn.
The new statement says:
Smith said it was a shame members left before Axon answered the technical question, but the company is “still looking for different perspectives to challenge our thinking.”
Retired members of the Ethics Council said they feared the planes would increase racial injustice, compromise confidentiality through surveillance and become more deadly if other weapons were added.
Wael Abdel-Almagid, a research associate professor of engineering and a member of the board of trustees at the University of Southern California, said:
The council also did not assess the use of the plane by police other than the first defendant, he said. And the members wondered how the drone could navigate to stop shooting indoors.
Drones “keep the public away from the real solution to tragic problems,” board members said this week.
Smith initially thought the drone could be placed in the hallway to move a room with a special hole. He said the aircraft system costs around $1,000 (£800) a year for schools.
Formed in 2018, the Ethics Panel has led Axon productively in the past, spearheading sensitive technologies like facial recognition.
Giles Herdale, one of the remaining members of the Ethics Council, told Reuters he chose to resign because he could have been more influential “if he were in the shop than out.”
For others, announcing the company’s drone before the official board report violates practice, said Ryan Calo, a law professor at the University of Washington.
“I think companies that are way behind expectations and protocols, or frankly, cross-border surveillance with non-lethal remote weapons, is an effective response to school shootings. I am not staying on the corporate advisory board,” she said. he said she.
Source: Metro
I have worked in the news industry for over 10 years. I have a vast amount of experience in covering health news. I am also an author at News Bulletin 247. I am highly experienced and knowledgeable in this field. I am a hard worker and always deliver quality work. I am a reliable source of information and always provide accurate information.