Federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump government and the head of the US Government Efficiency Department (Doge), Ilon Musk, from the implementation of a voluntary exit of civil servants until at least Monday afternoon.

The federal court judge George A. O’Toole Jr. He set a hearing on Monday afternoon to examine the further suspension of the implementation of Trump’s proposal to state officials, during which they had a deadline to declare their resignation until Thursday taking some rewards.

More specifically, in addition to the plan to create a “Riviera in Gaza”, Donald Trump has-undoubtedly-redeemed sensation in recent days with the announcement of a series of “special” aspirations about the future of America and the world in general. In this context, his “hand was put on” and I wasna Mask with his grand plan to consolidate -according to the state -of -the -art sector, putting in front of the application of a series of redundancies of state employees. Musk claims that in this way he will tackle federal bureaucracy and reduce payments that, according to him, lead the country to bankruptcy and high inflation.

State employees were made: they will be paid by the end of September – and will maintain their benefits – if they declare their resignation by February 6th.

The judge ‘puts a brake’

The “freezing” came from a lawsuit filed on Tuesday by US Federation of Government Officers And many other trade unions at the US Regional Court in Massachusetts, seeking a temporary restrictive order to stop the deadline.

I banned the defendants from taking any action to apply the so -called ‘Fork Directive’ until the completion of the documents and oral arguments“, O’Toole said. “I think so far I want to arrive today

Lawyers of the Ministry of Justice said they would inform all federal officials.

More than two million federal officials had a deadline by midnight on Thursday to accept the Trump “voluntary resignation” offer, as O’Toole is considering last -minute request to block the progress of the plan.

Three unions representing a total of 800,000 federal civil servants argued that Trump’s move is illegal, arbitrary and would result in a “dangerous combination” for the federal government.