The proclamation of emergency In the US by the US president, it is deeply concerned about the impact on the country’s political and social stability. As art historian Jay Clark observes in the “London Review of Books”, *The policy of an empire in fall is a mixture of wilderness and ridicule *, characterizing Trump’s precursor as a precursor to a changing and uncertain world.

Symbols and internal tension

Characteristic of this new era was the festive feast of Donald Trump’s 79th birthday, combined with the 250th anniversary of the US Army. This event took place in a climate of political challenge, with crowds demonstrating under the slogan * “No Kings” * in more than 2,000 cities. At the same time, the violent attack of a super -conservative against Democratic Party policies was yet another alarming sign of exacerbation of political confrontation, where, as analysts comment, the disagreement often touches the boundaries of the armed conflict.

Trump himself, who had been pre -election as a “peacemaker” * and had promised immediate solution to international crises, is today at the heart of the category that it is reinforcing conflicts, not only internationally but also within the US. It is recalled that during his first term, he had examined the possibility of the use of the army against * “disobedient” * citizens – a choice that transcends traditional institutional balances.

Mass expulsion and migratory

The hardening policy towards immigrants escalated this year with a number of strict measures: at the end of January, the Government was the protection regime for 600,000 Venezuelans, while in March it activated 18th -century legislation that allows expulsions without warning. On May 30, the Supreme Court ratified the mass deportation of 530,000 immigrants from Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba and Haiti, having previously approved tens of thousands of dismissals.

Army business and internal political rupture

In a sign of determination and ignoring the will of the local leadership, Trump ordered the mission of military forces to Los Angeles to tackle the immigration crisis. In this way, he proves his commitment to a policy he calls himself ‘More massive expulsion of history’. Currently, it is estimated that about 14 million people live in the US without legal documents, which raises concerns about the social and economic consequences of such a hard line.

Reactions and challenges to Congress

According to Kathryn Cliver Asbrook, an transatlantic analyst, Trump strategy is not only aimed at managing the migration crisis, but at distraction from other important internal problems. The pervasive dissatisfaction with its economic policy and the controversial legislative initiatives in the budget and tax sectors encounter a strong reaction to Congress. Although American society has shown historical strengths in divisive periods, new conditions seem to further test these balances.

Finally, it is worth noting that the differentiation of Trump’s position against Elon Musk’s policy on public finances demonstrates a rare recognition of previous mistakes. However, it remains uncertain whether he will choose more modest policies in the future.

Sources: ARD, TAZ, Surplus