The US Supreme Court opened on Monday, the way to repeat the deportations of irregular migrants to third countries from which they do not come to a victory for the Trump government.

The Ministry of Internal Affairs (DHS) welcomed the Supreme Court’s ruling, which it described as “Victory for the security of the American people“

The Supreme Court did not clarify his ruling and his three progressive judges expressed their disagreement.

Progressive judge of Supreme Court Sonia Sotomayor issued an opinion in which he accuses the government of “blatant illegal behavior“, Which” exposes thousands of people to the risk of torture or death “.

“The government clearly stated, in words and by deeds, that it does not feel binding by law and that it is free to deport anyone, anywhere, without warning or the ability to hear,” he added.

The case of questioning these deportations to third countries will now be examined by a Court of Appeal, but the Supreme Court’s ruling allows them to continue to continue.

The historical

The non -signed court ruling, dominated by the Conservative Judges, was taken in response to an appeal filed by the Ministry of Justice with the aim of removing the suspension of those who imposed a inferior court.

Federal Judge Brian Murphy had ordered the disposal of irregular migrants to third countries in April, judging that immigrants who do not have official documents are not able to appeal against them.

The judge had then stated that immigrants would have to have at least 15 days to appeal against their departure and provide evidence that they are at risk of torture or death if they were deported by the US.

The original case concerns 8 immigrants convicted of violent crimes in the US, according to the government. After boarding a flight to South Sudan, they are in the decision of this justice in Djibouti.

They are two nationals of Myanmar, one of Vietnam, one by Laos, two of Cuba, one in Mexico and one by South Sudan.

US President Donald Trump has made the fight against illegal immigration in its absolute priority, referring to a “invasion” into the US “criminals who have come from abroad”.

However, many court rulings, including by the Supreme Court, have raised obstacles or have put a brake on his mass deportations, mainly on the basis of the argument that those who are targeting their rights should be given the opportunity to claim their rights.