The Deputy Attorney General of the Republic, Lindôra Araújo, argues that the decision of Minister Alexandre de Moraes, of the Federal Supreme Court (STF), which authorized searches and seizure of equipment belonging to Bolsonarista businessman, in addition to other measures such as blocking of bank accounts and their respective social networks.
In a statement addressed to the magistrate himself this Friday (9), the representative of the PGR (Attorney General’s Office) says that there are “unconstitutionalities and illegalities” to justify the nullity of all acts already adopted within the scope of the investigation.
Lindôra asks Moraes, if he understands otherwise and does not accept his arguments, that the PGR’s appeal be submitted to a collegiate body of the court.
On August 23, the Federal Police executed search warrants against businessmen who were members of a private message group in which a coup d’état was defended if former President Lula (PT) defeats Jair Bolsonaro (PL) in the October presidential elections. .
Moraes also authorized them to be interrogated by the PF. Among the targets are Luciano Hang, from Havan, José Isaac Peres, from the Multiplan shopping chain, Ivan Wrobel, from Construtora W3, José Koury, from Barra World Shopping, André Tissot, from Grupo Sierra, Meyer Nigri, from Tecnisa, Marco Aurélio Raymundo, from Mormaii, and Afrânio Barreira, from the Coco Bambu Group.
The conversations between the businessmen were revealed by the Metrópoles website. THE Sheet showed that the minister’s order was solely based on journalistic reports.
According to a document prepared by Moraes’ office, only 2 of the 8 businessmen had been previously mentioned in inquiries into attacks on institutions and democracy.
“Mere assumptions and conjectures, combined with the criminal nature of the conduct that will be addressed in a specific topic of this petition, cannot justify the invasive precautionary measures enacted, in addition to the blocking of ALL [destaque feito pela vice-PGR] bank accounts of individuals, without stipulation of limit, affronts the dignity of the human person”, says an excerpt from Lindôra’s demonstration.
She considers that she has demonstrated in her opinion that there are “unconstitutionalities and illegalities that stand out from this investigation, with the absolute nullity of all judicial and investigative acts already materialized, as well as the manifest atypicality of the investigated conducts and the absence of minimum evidentiary substrate, to be evidenced flagrant illegal embarrassment”.
Therefore, concludes Lindôra, “it is urgent to adopt the exceptional way of locking this petition through the granting of an ex officio order by the collegiate body of the Federal Supreme Court”.
The deputy PGR also addresses in the document the fact that the agency was notified about the precautionary measures only after Moraes’ decision.
“The petitions and documents that gave rise to the initiation of the procedure were not sent to the Attorney General’s Office, nor the police representation for precautionary measures and elements that subsidized it”, he says.
He says that the minister fully approved, without prior consultation with the Attorney General’s Office, the PF representations for search and seizure and removal of telematic secrecy.
And which decreed on its own initiative (officio), without being requested by the police or the Federal Public Ministry, investigative measures such as the removal of bank secrecy from individuals and legal entities, in addition to the blocking of bank accounts.
Lindôra also maintains that the measures were disproportionate and, based only on journalistic material, devoid of minimal evidence.
There are no elements in the file, according to her, that corroborate the practice of any crime that could justify the adoption of “so invasive” police actions.
“In light of the reported facts, the normal course that is expected from Organs state bodies of prosecution is, initially, to seek to ascertain, through prior and preliminary investigations, the veracity and authenticity of the information and to analyze, in the light of the legal system, whether the facts represented constitute, in theory, criminal offenses”, he says.
Chad-98Weaver, a distinguished author at NewsBulletin247, excels in the craft of article writing. With a keen eye for detail and a penchant for storytelling, Chad delivers informative and engaging content that resonates with readers across various subjects. His contributions are a testament to his dedication and expertise in the field of journalism.
