THE Donald Trump entered the White House with huge plans to reshape the way of operating their government USA and concentrate power in his hands. And he has greatly managed to realize this vision, thanks to the frightened Congress, the hesitant institutions and the lukewarm judicial power, CNN notes in its analysis.

But there is increasing evidence that his entire agenda could be undermined and his party to face huge political consequences due to his arrogance on the most important issue for Americans: economy.

The Yesterday’s announcements for the labor market in the US confirm some of the worst fears.

In detail:

  • Preliminary data show that only 22,000 jobs were added in August, a number very low for an economy that needs about 100,000 seats a month to keep up with population growth.
  • The US economy has created just 107,000 jobs in the last four months in total. In addition to recession, these have been the worst numbers for decades.
  • June data were revised downward (lost 13,000 jobs), was the first negative month since December 2020.
  • Despite Trump’s promises that his duties would revitalize the US industry, the construction sector has lost 78,000 jobs this year.

The Trump government has made efforts to neutralize the negative headlines for these elements, saying – without proven – that the numbers are “tired” to make the situation worse. After July’s poor report, Trump fired his head Bureau of Labor Statistics And now he intends to replace her with his controversial supporter.

White House’s top financial adviser Kevin Hasset told CNBC: “This job number was definitely a little disappointing at the moment” while predicting future positive revisions.

Labor Minister Lori Chavez-Dememer admitted to Fox Business that the new report was below expectations. Commerce Minister Howard Latnik has demanded patience, inviting citizens to judge Trump for 12 -month jobs.

“Wait a year from now. Wow. They will be amazing numbers, ”he told CNBC.

But that goes a long way, CNN comments, adding that citizens are already negatively judging Trump’s economic policy:

  • A piston at the University of Queen at the end of August showed the worst acceptance rates for Trump in relation to the economy in both of his terms: 57% condemned against 39% of approved.
  • Gallup showed 37% acceptance for the economy, while in the first term it had averaging 52%. Only 29% of voters approved.
  • In a poll by Yahoo News -Yougov, Americans condemned Trump for the “cost of living” with more than 2 to 1: 62% condemned – 29% approved.

CNN commented that cracks are starting to even look at Trump’s always faithful base: the same poll showed that 27% of Republicans have condemned Trump for the cost of living. And a Pew Research Center survey showed that 32% of Republican voters disagree with the duties strategy.

All of this shows that the patience of even Trump’s most loyal supporters is being tested. Will they really give him another year to fix it?

The danger to Trump is the possibility that the image of the country’s economy will become so negative that it overshadows his entire term.

Trump’s power is largely based on tolerance. Citizens may not approve his methods, but they do not necessarily want to fight him. As long as the issues do not affect them directly, the reaction is limited.

Many of Trump’s most controversial initiatives have already been quite unequivocal -immigrants without legal procedures, the army came out on US territory, Medicaid was cut. But none of these issues caused a real revolution in Congress or anyone who could put a barrier to his agenda.

The economy is perhaps the only element that could change the data and bring the obvious concerns about his term. If things continue to go wrong, Trump and his partners may continue to blame the work or Fed that does not reduce interest rates.

But Americans will link the economic reality they are experiencing with something simple, easily understood and directly connected to Trump: his destabilizing movements to impose unilaterally unilaterally huge duties.

These are decisions he made without consulting Congress and despite the – albeit gentle – reservations of the Congress Republicans, who have been supporting free trade for decades.

Trump took responsibility for an already fragile situation and added a huge dose of uncertainty. He invested a huge political capital in this choice. And now it seems to be a bad bet.