(News Bulletin 247) – The European aircraft manufacturer stunned the markets this week by lowering its objectives for the current year. But its stock market performance remains above its eternal American rival, and its problems remain of a very different nature.

It was one of the highlights of the stock market week: Airbus sent a chill through the market on Tuesday when it lowered its outlook for 2024. The company cut its forecast for aircraft deliveries to 770 in 2024, down from 800 previously, and also slashed its adjusted operating profit and cash flow projections.

This is due to even greater difficulties than expected in the space sector and an unsuspected increase in tensions which has arisen in its logistics chain, particularly in terms of engines.

This setback constitutes a major hitch for the former EADS. Deutsche Bank has mentioned a “stunning” profit warning and Royal Bank of Canada fears that investors will place the stock in a “penalty box”, due to its execution not being free from reproaches.

The market accordingly sanctioned Airbus, and the stock lost 9.4% on Tuesday, its biggest fall in one session since November 2021, when fear of a new variant of Covid-19 scared the markets.

But, to quote the words (spoken in 2022) of Guillaume Faury, the executive chairman of Airbus, “when I look at myself I am sorry, when I compare myself I am consoled”.

>> Access our exclusive graphic analyses, and enter the confidence of the Trading Portfolio

Boeing significantly underperforms on the stock market

While Airbus has irritated the market, Boeing is still lagging far behind its big European rival on the stock market. Since the beginning of the year, Airbus has indeed lost 7.7%.

but Boeing is falling much more heavily (-30%). Over ten years, Airbus has shown an increase of 162% while Boeing has taken four times less (+43%).

Even if this indicator may have its limits, the percentage of analysts advising to buy the European group is higher. According to investing.com, it stands at 71% for Airbus compared to 64% for Boeing.

Beyond the simple stock market comparison, it should be remembered that while Airbus undoubtedly has problems, these problems are very different from those of its American competitor.

Boeing has inevitably suffered on the stock market from the setbacks with its 737 Max family, single-aisle aircraft that compete with Airbus’ A320 neo family, the A320 XLR being used to serve certain long-haul flights.

The 737 Max suffered two crashes in 2018 and 2019 that caused 346 deaths. The US Department of Justice warned in May that it could criminally prosecute Boeing for failing to comply with an agreement reached in January 2021 following these two crashes.

In January, the detachment of a door stopper – which blocked an emergency exit – from an Alaska Airlines 737 Max-9 further highlighted the technical problems of an aircraft which resembles a “cursed” for Boeing. The FAA, the American aviation regulator, had temporarily grounded 171 737 Max 9 aircraft. The American group then had to submit an action plan to remedy “systemic quality control problems” and thus achieve the standards required by the FAA.

In addition, the regulator has also opened an investigation into Boeing’s flagship 787 long-haul jet to determine whether mandatory inspections were carried out and whether documents were falsified.

Managerial uncertainty at Boeing

In addition to these industrial problems, the announced departure of Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun, scheduled for the end of the year, creates additional uncertainty. As does the potential acquisition of Spirit Aerosystems, a key supplier to Boeing (and its former subsidiary) but also to Airbus. Spirit itself is also in the FAA’s sights regarding the defects identified in the 737 Max 9.

All of these elements put Boeing in a particularly delicate situation. “As Boeing continues to face production quality issues and increased regulatory scrutiny, Airbus has gained significant market share despite also facing a constrained supply chain,” Royal wrote in May Bank of Canada.

With a “neutral” rating on Boeing, Bank of America judges that the group is certainly well positioned to benefit from the demand linked to the growth in air traffic, given its duopoly with Airbus. “However, the recovery of operations could take time and uncertainties remain in the near future (conclusion and financing of the Spirit Aero operation, search for a general manager, union negotiations, among others),” writes the bank.

“Airbus is in a much better position than Boeing, it is a ‘no brainer’ (obvious, Editor’s note). There is a culture of quality at Airbus which is a company of engineers, while Boeing has a culture financial and is experiencing significant quality concerns,” explains an analyst.

An intact long-term history for Airbus?

“The fact remains that investors are not happy (with the profit warning) from Airbus, even though the group has an avenue since Boeing is doing badly. Investors can very well play something other than Boeing and Airbus on the stock market,” he continues.

“After the warning there is always an effect of negative sentiment for the Airbus share which can last for a while and then it can start again”, nuance this same analyst.

Airbus therefore has execution problems where Boeing’s difficulties are deeper. The question is whether, despite the recent fall in the stock, the long-term promises displayed by the European group remain sufficiently attractive for investors.

Airbus still plans to produce 75 aircraft per month of its A320 neo family, its best-seller, in the medium term. A trajectory synonymous with a significant improvement in its results. But this objective was pushed back this week to 2027 compared to 2026 previously.

Deutsche Bank lowered its advice to “hold” from “buy” previously. “The dust needs to settle before we can become positive again,” says the bank.

Other research firms have maintained their purchase recommendations, such as Oddo BHF (at “outperformance”, more precisely). “The adjustment on Airbus is relatively limited and the competitive environment leaves the ‘investment case’ (the investment thesis, Editor’s note) intact in our eyes,” explains the broker.

“Ultimately, we believe that the long-term equity story of Airbus remains intact, as demand for Airbus products remains strong and the ramp-up of production has not failed, but is ‘only’ delayed”, concludes Stifel.