40-year-old Evangelos Koulianos of Spyros, accused of the murder, is awaiting the meeting of the Council of Delinquents of Rhodes on March 2nd, 2023, where it will be decided whether or not the order of the Prosecutor of Delinquents of Rhodes, by which his exit from the country was prohibited of his 75-year-old father Giorgos Kariotis last June in the Medieval City of Rhodes.

Yesterday, his lawyer, Mr. Despina Gryllis, received copies of the case file that has been filed in order to prepare a memorandum of opinions to be submitted before the Council. The possibility of requesting his personal presence should not be excluded.

In any case, on March 2, 2023, the 40-year-old for the first time will officially express his views on what is attributed to him by the police investigation, since after the initiation of criminal proceedings, he has sought with public statements to convince that he is a victim of “fraud” in order to defend the his innocence.

As the “Democratiki” revealed, one of the elements evaluated by the authorities is what was disclosed between the accused and two of his colleagues in their telephone conversations that have been recorded following legal wiretapping and monitoring.

Authorities are convinced he attempted to manipulate witnesses

The 40-year-old asked a colleague to change a statement he had given in which he said he had heard him talking to his father on the phone on June 14, 2022 while the victim was dead!

That is, he allegedly pretended to be talking to his father. Two of his colleagues even said they heard him on the phone talking to someone he called father on June 14, 2022.

Police also believe he tried to manipulate another witness when he asked to meet with him secretly.
The 40-year-old was asked why he pretended on June 14, 2022 to two colleagues that he was on the phone with his father and denied it, saying he was not talking to him but to a woman named ‘Pandora’ and that they probably thought he was talking to ‘Father’ of.

The content of the conversations in question as depicted in a report of transcripts of digital discs, which the “democratic” is bringing to the public today is as follows:

FIRST CONVERSATION
B. Come (…)
A. Come on, Bango
B. Come on
A. What does it say?
B. What, I’m in the house, I just entered
A. A! They took me from the Security. I should go downstairs and give a supplementary statement, ma’am…ma’am.
B. Complementary?
A. Yes, that’s what they told me.
B. Why?
A. They didn’t tell me. It says 10 minutes and says…
B. E 10 cents will really be … 10 cents
A. Yeah, I’m just telling you, baby.
B. Huh?
A. I’m just telling you.
B. Yes, you did well.
Oh yes.
B. If he asked you. If they ask you…
Oh yes
B. What time did I come to work? You should tell them 04:00 – 04:10 it was, tell them there.
A. Well, that’s what I’m going to say, what am I going to say?
B. But I was there at the same time, tell me. And it was crap
A. Yes, yes. Meanwhile, they were looking for the other one, but they don’t have his phone number.
B. Him (…)?
Oh yes.
B. Aaaah. For what reason; Supplementary?
A. Yes, supplementary.
B. Ah! Yes, yes.
A. Now what happens, I don’t know.
B. I can’t understand.
A. Me neither.
B. Well, probably not to you… Because you went and left quickly.
Oh yes.
B. And probably, and probably they would like to complete the deposition, not the
they still finished yours and his (…). Did you understand;
A. I don’t know, Vango. I do not know.
B. What can I say? What can I say, man? I do not know. They will probably notify me too at some point after they notified you again.
A. Unintelligible sentence.
B. Huh?
A. Yes, hey. I don’t know what to tell you.
B. Yes, okay (…).
A. They told me 18:30 to 19:00.
B. Fine. Okay, you haven’t. What; You’re going to give a deposition, that’s it
all.
A. Yes baby. Okay.
B. Just know that what you said the first time
Oh yes;
B. Say the same to the second one.
A. Yes, hey.
B. Did you understand? Because they want to see and compare what you will say again.
A. Yes baby. I do not know. Okay. I’m not going to say anything more.
B. Well done. And tell… and tell him at that moment
A. Yes, yes,
B. What I did say wrong. Say we were both wrong. He wasn’t talking to his father.
A. Yes, yes, yes.
B. Correct it
A. I will tell him.
B. Correct. Please fix it.
A. Yes, I will tell him. I’ll tell him that.
B. Well done. We made a mistake. He wasn’t talking to his father.
A. Yes, yes. I’ll tell him. I will tell him.
B. Okay, okay (…) me. And you will take me to tell me what happened.
A. Okay, bro.
B. It’s done… Thanks for letting me know.
A. Come on, come see you.
B. Come on.

SECOND CONVERSATION
B. Come (…)
A. Come (…). Where are you;
B. Down to., in the cemetery.
A. A! Let me tell you.
B. Come on
A. Did you say anything to him, the curmudgeon…
B. From what? .
A. Everything we discussed. Generally…
B. No, no, no. Nothing, nothing.
A. Why did I go from there now?
B. Huh?
Oh and. I called him (…)… and he comes out, he comes out. He’s probably sending his mother
and says he is not here.
B. Oh no. I didn’t say anything. I didn’t talk to anyone.
A. I just asked you if he knows…
B. No, no, no, no, no. I didn’t have much today with him. A little too
typically. We were talking normally until then. We didn’t even have… His work, my work. Goal.
I see.
B. I hadn’t. Not him, I didn’t talk to him at all. Nothing, nothing. If I tell you anything,
nothing.
A. Okay, bro
B. Okay?
A. Come, come.
B. Bo.. I might pass Mitso on later.
A. Okay, bro. Come.
B. Come on.
From 01:06
B. Come on, don’t say this on the phone because they might hear. We’ll see you from…
A. They don’t listen at all.