A life sentence, without any mitigating, imposed today the Joint Circuit Court of Appeal on the 49 -year -old wife for the murder of his 37 -year -old wife in January 2016 in Velvento Kozani.

In particular, the court unanimously adopted the prosecution’s “homicide from intent to a calm mental state” and condemned the perpetrator of the crime. The Court unanimously dismissed the request of the mitigators cited in defense of the defendant, such as lawful life, remorse, good behavior after the act was performed and the victim was challenged, and then unanimously dismissed “the conversion of life in prison. 10 -year sentence ‘requested by the defense. With the final reading of the sentence by the President of the Court, the 37 -year -old’s relatives broke out with rage against the defendant and needed the intervention of the OPEC men to calm the spirits.

The timeline of gynecopic

In his apology, the defendant said he had sincerely regretted what he did, while apologizing to the mother of the wrongful woman. Described the scene of the murder saying: ‘My wife said she wanted to separate and take the kids in Athens. She told me that her decision is definitive and the possibility of losing my children angered me” In court she told her wife that she knows all the messages she exchanged on her cellphone with her old erotic partner, said he blurred his mind when his wife hit him in the face and then hit her and then to Do not listen to the children her voices closed her mouth and nose. The president of the Mixed Circuit Court of Appeal and the Prosecutor of the Headquarters repeatedly asked the defendant if, in the 15 minutes the fight lasted until his wife was frustrated, he wondered what he was doing and if the thought of his mind went through his mind. stop. The defendant said he did not have the peace of mind to think at that time and that everything was done very quickly.

No mitigating for the accused

The prosecutor of the headquarters in his speech argued that “deception involves knowledge of the act” and that the defendant “had knowledge of his actions not only at the time of the crime but also when he tried to hide it, burying her body. In the field, eliminating her clothes, plowing the estate and trying to mislead the police by declaring her disappearance. ” The prosecutor asked the court to be found guilty of homicide in intent in a calm mental state.

Political action agreed with the prosecution’s argument, stressing that the boiling soul that the defendant claims did not stand and read the perpetrator’s detailed deposition with the police authorities where he describes in creepy details of the crime and the last moments of his wife. “No one who is in a boiling soul does not remember such details of the crime described by the accused in the police“He said and added:”The apology of the perpetrator heard today in court would make sense and substance if expressed by acts immediately after his criminal act which we did not see in the evidence presented“

The defendant’s defense attempted to create cracks in the established and haunted first -instance ruling of the crime in a calm mental state, claiming that “no one decides to kill in his home and even when his children are in the room” “It was the result of an initial quarrel that led things into an explosion to the condemnable act to occur.” Finally, he asked the court to acknowledge these characteristics of the act.