Today, Petros Filippides’ apology for the two attempts at the expense of his colleagues, who was interrupted on Friday due to the unwonation of the accused, is expected to be completed before the Joint Circuit Court of Appeal.

According to the court planning, if the apology is over early, then it is not excluded that the procedure will immediately proceed with the speech of headquarters Andrea Karaflou on guilt.

The president of the court, however, at the previous meeting, when the defendant requested a disruption of the apology, said to everyone that no other apology meeting would be held. “I say it to be prepared. We will stay for the apology as needed, ”he said, staring at the accused.

The rape attempt at 2014

Petros Filippidis is expected to refer to the second case of rape attempted rape today that he has committed 2014 against an actor he had met for business reasons.

The act allegedly took place in the car of the defendant who, after a meeting with the complainant, for a role, offered to return her home. But instead, she led her to a stalemate narrow in Paleo Psychiko where she attempted to rape her by pressing the central lock of the car. According to the passion, he escaped because he had pretended to be a panic attack and was hysterical. The woman claims she had thrown her out of the car with a jerk. “If you want and a role,” she claims to have told her.

“Whatever happened, it became consensual”

In his apology on Friday, the accused actor said he had never been violently at the expense of a man and that with the two women “everything that happened was consensual.”

As he said, “I might have been unfaithful, arrogant, selfish, but I was not rapist”, stressing that for everything “I had a green light from women”.

According to the artist, the principle of the case for himself and some other artists who were at the center of Metoo was an attempt to “redistribute the pie in the space” with a pandemic fuse. “We had jobs before the pandemic,” he said, and developing his position referred to “a circle of twenty people” who “put me in the middle”.

According to this defendant, the answer to the question he received many times from the seat about the reason they came to court “so many witnesses and turned against you”. As for the first complainant’s motivation to participate in all this and say “these lies” is that “he charges me that he didn’t make the career he wanted in the theater” said Petros Filippidis.