The 40 -year -old former Sunday companion is today called upon to stand up to the Judges of the MAU and to speak publicly about the five knives who cut the thread of the 28 -year -old’s life outside the Agioi Anargyroi Police Department on the night of April 1. Response.

With the defendant accepting the crime recorded – but claiming that he does not remember the circumstances of the murder he committed – the appeal is not guilt, but whether or not he has a reduced imputation.

In front of the judges, the 40 -year -old is called upon to talk about his life, his relationship with Sunday and his post -death situation. All, words, movements, expressions, silences, will be evaluated by judges who will respond by their decision if the person who is sitting for a month now in the dock is pretending to be a heavy mentally ill.

Their decision will judge the penalty but also the detention space of the former Sunday partner. Thus, the actors in the trial are awaiting today with great interest in the speech of the prosecutor of the headquarters to be placed, as soon as the defendant’s apology is completed, on the issue raised from the outset: “He was conscious of his heinous act by the perpetrator or – because of his / her mental illness and mental illness;

Reduced imputation demands defense – life imprisonment wants the victim’s family

In the preceding meetings, the two sides of the victim and victim – strongly supported their positions with the defense claiming from the first moment that the perpetrator should be recognized.

In lawyer of the accused, Spyros Dimitriou, the crime is linked to the perpetrator’s heavy psychopathology. At the start of the trial, Mr Dimitriou had requested that the court a reduced capacity to impose to his client. Reduced imputation means a reduced penalty, in accordance with the law.

As Mr. Dimitriou had said With a reduced imputation: “He will serve 15 years on a special storage regime without benefits. When he applies, he must have an opinion on a psychiatrist to be released.

An is not accepted by the court and impose life imprisonment – which practically mean 18 years – I will have to exercise appeal and will follow at least other three trialspeople will suffer. Then i will apply attentive and this can lead to imposing a sentence just 6.5 years old. I’ve been asking for 15 years. I seek guilt by recognizing reduced imputation and the protection of the community as a whole by dangerous people. “

Her side victim’s familychallenges the defense by believing that the reduced imputation are a approach and oppose: “He is lying! How does the danger and gravity of his disease come about? Anyone who is dangerous is a priori incompetent? ” The psychiatrists who testified in court, both the treatments and the technical advisers, did not seem to agree to their estimates to the question that was repeatedly raised by the seat: “was he consciously, the ability to understand the injustice of his 40 -year -old act?”

Two of them anyway witnessesone of whom is watching the 40 -year -old from the beginning, testified that the accused possibility has complete imputation and was not under the influence of substances. This is also the response of the judicial authorities appointed Psychiatrist And this position was also adopted by the judges of the Council who referred the 40 -year -old to trial.

As stated in the parliament that adopted analogous Prosecutor’s Office, the perpetrator “in a calm mental state, that is, in the utter consciousness of the practitioners, in the sense of the possibility of perceiving his act and their consequences, killed outside the Police Department on Sunday Griva. The defendant seems to be a free active psychopathology, and his mental state did not prohibit him from having a perception of reality“

The judges of the Council of Criminal Court believed that the 40 -year -old “carried out a sober execution of the attack on the passion and after a systematic and persistent monitoring, at least on that day and the previous one”.

Today the prosecutor of the headquarters is expected to give her own response to the matter.