The Greek family is not threatened, as some say to win a few votes, by equality in civil marriage. The Greek family and the future of young people is threatened by the government’s policies”, emphasized the PASOK-KINAL special buyer, Pavlos Christidiswho, giving the stigma of his party’s position in bill on equality in civil marriage, made it clear that PASOK “will rise to the occasion» regardless of the reasons that led the government to take this initiative.

Mr. Christidis criticized the government, to which he attributed responsibility “for the division that prevails in public opinion”, which as he said does not consist of its legislative initiative as such, but in the well-known frivolity that characterizes it and in its permanent practice, to shapes the communication narrative of its leader, instead of taking care to solve problems and prioritize the interest of society over the individual interest of Mr. Mitsotakis.

He also argued that the civil marriage equality bill did not emerge as a conscious choice by the government to resolve an important problem of existing discrimination based on sexual orientation, but as an attempt by the government’s communications staff to present Mr. Mitsotakis as a progressive and defender of human rights. political rights.

In any case, as Mr. Christidis said, regardless of the reasons that led the government to file this bill.

PASOK-KINAL considers it its duty to rise to the occasion and declare that “we are all obliged to respect the Constitution which imposes without exception absolute respect for human rights, among which is equality and any prohibition, discrimination based on gender, race or sexual orientation”. Even the special buyer of PASOK-KINAL emphasized that no one can impose on a religion what it will and will not recognize as marriage, and no religion can impose on a modern state what it will and will not recognize as a civil marriage, clarifying that the only discrimination and prohibition that is legitimate and we must maintain is the prohibition of marriage, apparently between minors.

He also noted that the majority of families are indeed traditional, but there are single-parent families, there are families without children, there are already families of same-sex couples with or without children, and there are also children belonging to more than one family, and he pointed out that the absence of relative of legislative recognition does not mean that they do not exist and their existence for several years, no institution of the family has been affected.

Finally, the special buyer of PASOK, emphasized that under no circumstances does a marriage entail her right adoption and added that the right to apply for adoption today is available to all adult people, regardless of whether they are married or married, regardless of their sexual orientation, and for decades now, what has been examined by the appropriate scientists is that in every case of adoption, they should be served with the best possible way the interests of minors.