By Gifts Antoniou

The intensity with which the political controversy over Tempi, as well as the reactions recorded in public opinion, shows that the issue has returned to the news with a particular dynamic, which requires similar manipulations. The government is moving in two directions: on the one hand to show that it understands the absolutely justified indignation of the citizens and the demand for complete clarification of the causes of accident and the rendering of justice. And on the other hand to repel the opposition accusations of concealment and deliberate delay in the course of investigations.

The government spokesman gave the mark yesterday, and the prime minister is expected to be placed today. Kyriakos Mitsotakiswho will give a television interview.

“Let’s say that all this is perfectly reasonable. And the rallies, the overwhelming majority of the world going to protest for justice. It is not a strange thing for people to want justice. It is reasonable and imperative » pointed out Paul Marinakis In an interview he gave to his television SKAIwanting to show that the government perceives and share the agony that is emitted by society. Referring to the opposition’s objections for slow rhythms in research, he stressed: “One who wants to conceal, as the Prime Minister accuses, what would he do, Mr Economou? He would push the justice, as the previous one of us did, who had justice and intervened in justice, and would say: “Come on, close the interrogation quickly to go to trial, to celebrate that at one time the interrogation was over, Let’s run, go to court ”and go saying. If this had been done, the illegal, anti -infinite and we are supposed to be in our favor, why would we quickly close the interrogation, which is unthinkable, what would we not have? We would not have two very important, as it may seem, which is the last one, the one in the case file and a second, of the EPASAM. One is the finding of the NTUA, which will be given the answer to the explosion and for all the rest. We are waiting. ”

It is clear that the government will not leave unanswered questions and complaints so as not to further fuel this debate on investigations. It seems that in an initial phase, however, the dimensions of the issue may have been underestimated, and there were no lack of positions that were considered to be derogatory and derogatory to the mobilizations that took place on Sunday. It is now different in the style and the intensity with which the government chooses to answer, as well as the willingness not to let go of spikes and suspicions and not leave the initiative of the opposition parties.