By Gifts Antoniou

The ultimate way in which ND side was rejected as ‘Undeclared and legally unfounded’ his proposal PASOK For pre -trial committee for eight politicians – the two former ministers Kostas Karamanlis and Christos Spirtz and Six Deputy Ministers of Transport and Infrastructure – He discounts a charged political climate for the next few days, with conflicts and exchange of categories.

It also discounts that the government majority, as expected and essentially announced, will bring its own proposal, which is expected to be expected by government sources. “Within the next few days”. From the reaction recorded yesterday by ND it is discounted that the ruling party’s proposal will only concern the Kostas Karamanlis And it will be a misdemeanor.

It is all but coincidence that, in terms of persons, on the ruling party side they are made Two notes:

1) That the transmitter who arrived in Parliament from justice concerns only ministers and does not include deputy ministers. “Therefore, PASOK’s attempt to add to his indictment the deputy ministers of the above period has no legal basis, he is not based on facts and conflicts even with the official transmitter of justice, which expressly refers to ministers.”mentioned.

2) that for the former SYRIZA government minister, Christos Spirtzthere has been a limitation period. “Any acceptance of the proposal necessarily implies Mr Spirtz’s discharge and is therefore simply made for the creation of impressions.”is in the relevant comment.

Based on these two points, the government’s majority essentially express its intention to its own proposal to confine itself to Kostas Karamanlis. Concerning what this proposal could include, the way in which PASOK’s proposal is sought to be sought to be sought to be point by point. for which it is highlighted:

1) The supervision of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport is only administrative in OSE – ERGOSE and in no way concerns security issues. RAS and the European Railway Organization had issued certificates for the safety of rail transport before the Tempe tragedy, reported by ND. and in line with it they ask the question “What could any minister do when the Railway Safety Authorities certified their safe operation?”

2) That ministry officials are being prosecuted because they did not take the necessary steps to the minister to take additional measures and, therefore, that it is possible for the investigator to call for criminal inspection of officials for not doing so and the minister to do so?

3) that the assertion of the PASOK That the indictment against directors must also be transferred to their supervisor, because criminal liability is personal and not collective.

4) That political responsibility for systemic problems is not identified with criminal responsibilities and even a criminal nature, as in this logic all Ministers of Infrastructure and Transport should be criminalized for accidents on highways that have not been completed, health ministers for shortcomings.

All this reasoning developed on the part of the government majority in response to PASOK’s proposal, apparently applies to any other proposal from the opposition to the Parliament. It is an argument that has been formulated by government officials in the past and confirms that the government majority will move to the logic of a proposal for a misdemeanor for Kostas Karamanlis, the possibility of a breach of duty, directly referring to the Judicial Council. In such a process the government spokesman referred yesterday, Paul Marinakisstating that “The Judicial Council and Witnesses can call and investigative acts can do and propose enlargement of indictments.”