Official position on his issue OAKA took the Panathinaikos.
The green PAE leaves spikes for the study referring to static problems of the roofer.
So it characterizes “rather a random event” that it is made public after two sold-out of the “greens” in the stadium and asks answers.
In detail n announcement states:
“With regret we were informed of the existence of study for the roof of the football field of the Olympic Stadium, which concludes that from its construction does not respond at the allowable levels of static adequacy.
It provokes impression the fact that the canopy was made by Calatrava, of leading architects in the type of these constructions and from the Cimolaithe world’s leading steel construction company, which has built the canopies of most European football stadiums, while the project involved most important Greek architects and engineers.
PS Will be rather a random event the point in time when a study that started the 2021in a period when Panathinaikos hosted at this particular stadium 120,000 viewers…
P.S.1 He was asked about the study that was prepared, o Calatrava and the company Cimolai;
P.S.2 A while ago we were informed that the initial static study provided very heavy glazing on the roof of the shed and were finally installed instead plexiglass/lexanbecause they did not catch up with the schedule of the Olympic Games.
The canopy was built with specifications to withstand the weight of the windows, which it is multiple of lexan.
Do the people who did the static control study know this? We are waiting answers/clarifications».
Source: Sport Fm
I am currently a news writer for News Bulletin247 where I mostly cover sports news. I have always been interested in writing and it is something I am very passionate about. In my spare time, I enjoy reading and spending time with my family and friends.