Sports

The first Lanois video with the analysis of the disputed phases: “The Astera goal is illegal, penalty for PAOK”

by

Published on Tuesday evening (20/08), as announced yesterday (19/08) by Makis Gagatsis in “Skay Trial”his first video Stéphane Lanois with her analysis of selected contested phases from Stoiximan Super League premiership games.

Its president KEDwe remind restores the weekly analysis program of selected phases of the championship. The video will be released after the end of each matchday, Monday or Tuesday.

It needs to clarified how the phases, like emphasized by the EPOwhich are analyzed, they are chosen by the president of KED himself and his associates and these are what he believes should be known to the groups and the public. Not all phases, which are considered questionable. “The purpose is knowledge of the regulations and not TV criticism“, the federation says.

In regards to his first video, then, Lanois first explains why, where the penalty was correctly awarded with which PAOK tied Panserraikos, but also the reason why no penalty was given to the Panserraikos player’s hand within the greater area. He then emphasizes that the first yellow card for Vigiafanes, in Volos-Olympiakos, should have been straight redwhile adding that the VAR had to intervene and take care of the expulsion. And it closes with the phase in OAKA, the goal of Asteras AKTOR against Panathinaikos, underlining that it is irregular. The chief referee of EPO reminded that in the event that there is a player of the attacking team at a distance shorter than allowed from the wall of the defenders, then an indirect goal must be given. As Mr. Lanois, the referee at Panathinaikos-Asteras AKTOR said characteristically he should be alert and more active.

Earlier, moreover, as revealed by Kyriakos Thomaidis in his broadcast to News Bulletin 247, “Tuesday Appeal”Mr. Lanois mentioned in today’s (20/08) meeting with the referees that Tasos Sidiropoulos made a mistake in the 0-1 phase in Panathinaikos-Asteras AKTOR, since the player of Arcades is harassing the wall and is, of course, not in a measure due. Therefore, the visitors’ goal had to not count and be attributed indirectly to the “greens”.

We remind, earlier, as the guest of the show pointed out, Panagiotis Varouhas and the other guest also pointed out, George Spaneasfound in the studio of the country’s top sports frequency, o Tasos Sidiropoulos wrongly cited the non-functioning of the VAR in the 0-1 phase of the Arcades, since anyway he could not intervene!

Watch the video with Lanois’ analysis of the contested phases:

Source: Sport Fm

You May Also Like

Recommended for you