Objection of Panathinaikos for the phase with the anti-athletic team of Nan while Ataman had first been given a technical penalty!

THE Panathinaikos filed an objection against its validity match with Paris and for the phase, specifically, at 75-68when the one referee gave a technical penalty to Ergin Ataman and… at the same time, the other referee charged me unsportsmanlike Kendrick Nunn in the Cavaliere and even with a significant delay!

To start from the beginning, as the phase raises a lot of talk and no one has understood exactly what the referees of the match gave, the coach of the “clover” she protests vehemently for a foul, which was not given to Mitoglou. So, while Paris is bringing the ball down, one of the referees charges the Turkish coach with a technical penalty. Normally the game should have stopped there! However, not only did this not happen, with the match continuing, but seconds later, in the same phase, the other referee gave unsportsmanlike to Nan, with everyone trying to figure out what’s going on! The referees, in fact, gathered in the center of the field and discussed for a while, deciding, in the end, for Paris to take one shot for the technical penalty, two for the unsportsmanlike and take possession!

That’s what he did enraged Ataman even morewho immediately went to the secretariat and signed that an appeal would be filed, as was done after the match was over. We remind you, from this phase Paris essentially “locked” the victory. Ifi made it 76-68 with a technical penalty shot and Yantunen, after Cavalier was injured, made it 78-68 with two shots of his own.

See the phase here.