Sports

Malatos in the Trial at SKAI for the Karypides-Marinakis dispute: “EPO’s legal obligation to intervene”

by

Where is she headed? Marinaki-Karipidis dispute? The president of IDEAD, Andreas Malatosgave the answers by speaking to Lawsuit against SKAI.

“Clearly all of this is worthy of investigation. Apart from the personal dispute, which will be decided in the courts, the main victim of this dispute is football. We certainly have a guilty party, whether Ms. Karypidis is telling the truth and Mr. Marinakis is responsible, or she is lying and Mr. Marinakis is the victim of slander. I repeat, it is certain that the only one affected is Greek football” he initially stated and continued:

“When the main players, the league president and the president of Mars, make such accusations against each other, it all has a negative impact. So the football authority, the EPO, which also has the competent bodies, should intervene. It should be noted here that the offenses of bribery, corruption and match-fixing are non-bailable, it does not matter when they were committed. Even in 2013.

The second important element that the Ethics Committee should address is that now this case has become common property, everyone knows it. There is no justification for an EPO body not to be aware of this case. They must know and follow the trial, it is their duty.

They can’t not investigate and search, what will come out is something else. It is their legal obligation to intervene. The Executive Committee of the EPO has the obligation to ensure the honor of football. They could turn to the Ethics Committee, and intervene.

I would like to point out that regardless of the content of the dispute that will come to justice, the Ethics Committee can also deal with non-football matters, as long as football people are involved, for such accusations.

It is not exclusively a matter of justice and a lawsuit. He must investigate even if there were attempted bribes.”

Finally, for the murder of the policeman case, George Lyggeridisnoted: “Obviously the one who gave the tickets and the one who managed them had a relationship. Of a material or ideological nature, I cannot determine.

There was a relationship. To what point it reaches, so that we can talk about the expansion of this pyramid, that is a matter for the inquiry to find. The item exists. Those accused of criminal organization had a relationship with those who gave them the tickets and credentials. Any inquiry cannot overlook this.”

Source: Sport Fm

You May Also Like

Recommended for you