Extraordic Bourbou by Gagatsi and Dimitriou, Saraki

And domestic or international organ

EXTRAORDINARY STATE

By reserving rights

Of Christos Bourbou, former professional footballer, President of KEP, resident of Ioannina

K a a

1. Chrysostomou Gagatsis, President of the EPO and Managing-Prophet of the EPO Licensing Department,

2. George DIMITRIOU, Head of the EPO Licensing Department,

3. Vassiliou Sarakis, former Head of the EPO Licensing Department and a member of the EPO Legal Service

As you know, my case against PAO OFI is pending at the same time before CAS, the EPO Arbitration Court and the Athens Court of Appeal.

To my knowledge, PAO OFI has not issued any provisional order or decision to suspend the execution of the decisions of the TSI to prevent the process of enforcing them by any football body.

But you, by the decision of the EPO’s first instance body, licensed PAO OFI ignoring the irrevocable decisions of the TSI and without calling me before the RFO, you rejected my multiple complaints and requests, and you did not notify me!

Indeed, in order to calm our protests and the adverse comments of the press, a clear violation of the principle of confidentiality for which you are cut off, you were leaked to the media part of the reasoning of your skepticism, according to which PAE was licensed.

Where, however, when your arbitrariness exceeded any limit, it was your attitude towards my complementary lawyer in the trial before CAS Kosma Mitsio, as in his courtesy for granting the decision of the RFO, in order to use it in the process before the CAS as you have a direct legal interest. And you refused to notify him of the licensing decision of PAO OFI, acting as ANTIKIC AND NOT AS A MY OM!

At the same time you have allowed PAO OFI to maintain its lawsuit before the Athens Court of Appeal against the decision of the ICT, without imposing the disciplinary sanctions of Article 35 of the CFP, blindly following the recommendations of your legal adviser, Mr. TRUE, IF I DON’T HAVE TO SUPPORT THE PAINTY OF PAO Appendition of the Employment of the EXPERIENCE!

It is obvious that the EPO contradicts itself, while the disagreement between its President, its Legal Service and the Head of Licensing is evident, because the latter in his official response to the KEP Legal Adviser, -And unknowingly UEFA- who ratified him by decision of the Executive Committee!), in order to harm the interests of the members of the KEP and not to execute the decisions of the ICT!

Because the first of you after taking up your duties as President of the EPO, you were publicly committed to the positive response of the old players, but unfortunately your term of office has been characterized by contradictions as well as debt, and in the issue of prohibition of the lawsuit in the courts.

Because the second of you, while once again assumed his duties as Head of the EPO licensing department, in his honor he revealed in his document the “regulatory fraud” of his predecessor, he finally proved by his recent illegal licenses by PAE, of athletic succession, in the interim period, were overthrown!

Because the third one of you, either as the Head of the Licensing Department, or as a dominant official of the EPO Legal Service, remains a “instrument of interests” and acts as a … Juk boxing of the football director of football, without even hesitating to ” Football players with active cards and decades of careers and ultimately to misrepresent his own memorandums, falsely and by profession!

FOR ALL THESE REASONS

And with the prejudice of all my legal right

I call you, as within three (3) days:

1.To grant me a copy of the decision of the RFO/EPO with which you licensed PAO OFI,

2. Call me before the IAO/EPO during my appeal against the primary decision,

3. To let me know if your OFI PAE has notified any decision or temporary order to suspend the execution of the ICT decisions,

4. Call the EPO Executive Committee, the Head of Licensing and the EPO Legal Service to explain to you, on the one hand, the different attitude of the EPO towards me and PAO OFI in the trials before the EPO organs and the CAS or the CAS, on the other hand 71-73 and

5. To discuss your legal advisor to your Executive Committee for discussion in conjunction with the pending January complaint against PAO OFI and Super League 1 for the application of Article 35 and decide on the prohibition of appeal to civil courts.

I complain about your unacceptable practices and approaches in which in order to serve the interests of PAO OFI, you harm my personal property rights and you are irreparably affected by football self -government by risking a new and much more painful international.

I complain to the competent international football bodies, the President of the EPO, the Head of Licensing and the EPO Legal Service and

I tell you that if you do not comply with the aforementioned requests, you will suffer the appropriate legal consequences of the competent domestic and international courts.

Athens 26.5.2025

The attorney

George Panagopoulos