THE Demis Nikolaidis He spoke on Nova’s Monday FC show about AEK’s overthrow with Kifissia, leaving Luca Jovic and stressing that he was a catalyst for the outcome of the match.
At the same time, he commented on his arbitration Vergetinoting that the penalty shootout was very strict in favor of Kifissia and that the arbitration did not like the Union.
In detail what Demis said:
“You saw and you didn’t believe what you were seeing. AEK’s performance was shocking. Nikolic analyzes opponents, he knew that Tetei was a death. Something wrong went there. The AEK may have improved aggressively, but Kifissia missed opportunities to the end. A second bad AEK match, but a huge victory with ten players. It holds psychology, mentality and three degrees. Fortunately it has a break because it is not in a good time. Tetei is good. You never leave him alone with a defender. The striker always has an advantage. The defender follows. There should have been a player nearby. All phases were counterattacked. The opposite of Nikolic said. It’s a team, they have time to see it.
Nikolic risked playing three in the defense, with less and two player. I hold Jovich who is doing best. He came in and turned it on his own, scoring and taking a penalty starting ten meters below the center. Good Jovic wants AEK, he starts and finds himself. Strakosa was very good, Rota in the end played without fear, Joao Mario had a positive presence. Something did not go well with the coach’s commands. ”
For arbitration:
“We had arbitration in the match. They have taken me phones. I find some reactions excessive. AEK disliked the arbitration. That’s what I received. VAR also has disadvantages. You see Strakosa’s penalty in Tetei. It doesn’t go through your mind that it is. He finds his head by hand, whether he found a ball but at the same time I didn’t see it anywhere. We are not sure, and if we are not, we do not give it. Strict, but there is contact. I wouldn’t give it.
For the phase with the hand of the commerce there must be a specific command. Phases cannot be given a penalty and in other matches the same hands are not given. Do we give these hands? I don’t give it. On the other hand, such hands have been given. Let’s see if it is in a natural position, if it is intent, if there is a close distance, if it comes from a teammate. A similar penalty has been given. Well he did and he didn’t, but reminded me of a similar penalty shoot -out. The arbitration did not like AEK, I have this feeling. The referees must have a specific line. Lanua, whom I don’t hear with great care because he is doing a little politics. Convince me why one phase is a penalty in one match and in another it is not. “
Source: Sport Fm
I am currently a news writer for News Bulletin247 where I mostly cover sports news. I have always been interested in writing and it is something I am very passionate about. In my spare time, I enjoy reading and spending time with my family and friends.
