Nothing Tawfik and Sean Coughlan
BBC News Brazil
The Duke of Sussex told BBC that he would “love reconciliation” with the royal family in an exciting interview in which he said “devastated” for losing a lawsuit about his safety in the United Kingdom.
Prince Harry said his father doesn’t talk to him because of the security issue, but he didn’t want to fight anymore and didn’t know how much life King Charles 3 still had.
The prince told BBC News in California after losing an appeal on the safety levels he and his family are entitled to while in the UK.
“I can’t imagine a world where I would bring my wife and children back to the UK right now,” he said after the defeat.
“There were so many misunderstandings between me and some members of my family,” he said, stating that now “forgave them.”
“I would love to reconcile with my family. It’s no use continuing to fight, life is precious,” Harry said.
“I don’t know how long my father has, but he doesn’t talk to me because of this security issue,” he said.
The prince wanted to reverse the changes in his safety, introduced in 2020, when he left a member of royalty and moved to the United States.
Saying that he felt “disappointed,” he described his defeat in court as a “good old stablishment frame” and blamed the royal family for influencing the decision to reduce their safety.
Asked if he had asked the king to intervene in the security dispute, Harry said, “I never asked him to intervene – I asked him to move away and let the experts do his job.”
The prince said the way he was treated during the decision -making process “revealed the worst fears.”
Prince Harry spoke to the BBC shortly after losing his latest legal action against the British government about the level of security he and his family are entitled to during his visits to the United Kingdom.
The Court of Appeal rejected the prince’s case, who depended on the decision of an official committee to remove his eligibility for automatic and complete protection, such as other royal members receive.
On Friday, the court ruled that Prince Harry filed “strong” arguments about the level of threat he and his family face, but said his “feeling of complaint” did not “translate into a legal argument.”
His legal complaint revolved around a committee called Royalty Protection and Public Figures (Ravec), which authorizes the security of royalty members on behalf of the Interior Ministry, and was chaired at the time by Sir Richard Mottram.
According to the committee’s regulations, Prince Harry argued, his case should have been presented to the Ravec Risk Management Council (RMB), which would have evaluated threats to his safety and that of his family – but that has not happened.
On Friday, senior judges said the committee had diverged from politics by making its 2020 decision on the prince’s security, but concluded that it had been “sensible” to do so due to the complexity of his circumstances.
Source: Folha
With a wealth of experience honed over 4+ years in journalism, I bring a seasoned voice to the world of news. Currently, I work as a freelance writer and editor, always seeking new opportunities to tell compelling stories in the field of world news.