The US Federal Senate -controlled Senate rejected a Democratic proposal yesterday to prevent President Donald Trump from ordering a new use of military power against Iran without the green light of Congress, a few hours after the leader of the state.

The vote (53 against, 47 in favor) rejected a resolution over the declaration of war, which brought back to the class of President Trump and predicted that Congress would need to be approved to order new hostilities against Iran.

In general, the party lines were adhered to, but Democratic Senator John Ferman, who is elected to Pennsylvania, was opposed, while Republicans, including Rand Paul, who is elected in Kentucky, voted in favor.

Democratic Senator Tim Caine, a key rapporteur of the resolution, has been trying for years to reaffirm Congress’s power to declare war, take it back from both democratic and Republican presidents.

Mr Caine reminded that his venture was intended to emphasize that the American Constitution recognizes in Congress, not in the president, the right to declare war and to demand any hostility against Iran to expressly approve, either by declaring warfare or by war.

“If you think the president should have come to Congress, either if you are in favor or if you are against the war with Iran, you will support the resolution,” you will support the Constitution, which withstood the test of time, “Mr Kaine said before.

Members of Congress are pushing to be informed of the bombings launched by the United States last weekend in Iran, as well as the fate of high level of high levels of Islamic democracy.

Earlier yesterday, US President Trump was expressed in acute tones for Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Hameni, adding that he would not exclude new bombings if Tehran begins to enrich heaven.

He reacted to the position of Ayatollah Hameni in his first appearance after the 12-day war launched by Israel and ended roughly two 24 hours after the bombings of US strategic bombers against three key nuclear facilities.

Following updates with confidential content made by members of President Trump’s team to top executives of the House of Representatives and Senate, Thursday and Friday, democratic politicians said that They have not been convinced that Iranian nuclear facilities were “destroyed”as President Trump assured after the blows.

Mr Caine’s proposal opponents argued that the raid on Iran was an isolated, limited -scale operation within the president’s privileges, not on the start of a large scale of hostilities.

Republican Senator Bill Haggetti, who is elected to Tennessee and served as ambassador to Japan during Mr Trump’s first term (2017-2021), resisted that the proposal would prevent any president from taking the US.

“We must not wear a chain on our President’s feet in the midst of a crisis, when lives are at stake.”he argued.

President Trump rejects any challenge of the damage to the Iranian nuclear program by US bombings.

Iran insists that it is a sovereign right to have a nuclear program for political purposes and has denied for decades that it is seeking to obtain nuclear weapons, such as Western governments and Israel.

Under US law, the Senate has privileges and priority in declaring any war and therefore had to consider and vote on the Kane proposal immediately – it was submitted earlier this month.

In order to enter into force, both the Senate and the House of Representatives had to pass. But the Speaker of the Lower House, the Republican Mike Johnsona faithful ally of the president, he stressed earlier this week that he does not find that it is time for anything.

During the first term of Donald Trump – in 2020 -, Mr Caine himself submitted a similar resolution to limit the captain of the state to order war against Iran.

That measure was approved, both by the Senate and by the House of Representatives, but without the number of votes required to overcome the presidential veto.