The biceps eagle is the framework of Turkey’s foreign policy, Recep Tayyip Erdogan said, according to SKAI correspondent Manolis Kostidis.

“We look at both the West and the East, Africa, Asia, the Balkans and Latin America,” he said and reiterated the well -known position of two states in Cyprus.

“In our speech to the General Assembly, from the slaughter in Gaza, we also gave messages to areas that hold a separate position on the outside
Turkey’s policy, from Africa to Asia, from the Balkans to Latin America.

We have once again defended the fair case of the Turkish Cypriots. On the basis of the fact that there are “two separate states and two separate peoples” on the island, we reiterated our call for recognition of the ‘Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus’. Our speech was the essence, the summary, the framework of Turkey’s foreign policy, which is implemented with a prospect of 360 degrees and inspired by the Double -headed eagle of the Seljuks looking at the East and the West at the same time, “the Turkish president said.

Erdogan: Our visit to America is extremely successful and the meeting with Trump

“We discussed trade, defense industry, energy. Aiming 100 billion.

“We visited Washington at the invitation of US President Donald Trump after intensive contacts in New York, we had a comprehensive, productive and meaningful meeting with Mr Trump and his delegation to the White House on September 25th. We discussed many issues with Trump in a friendly atmosphere, especially bilateral trade, investment, energy and defense industry, discussing the steps to be taken to achieve the $ 100 billion trade target we put together in the first term. The only reason why the opposition, including politicians, journalists and commentators, is trying to defame our visit to America in a state of absolute madness, is that the visit was extremely successful. “

Opposition: Erdogan’s groom does not want the F -16s – insists on Turkish fighter. “

Namik Tan, MP of Republican People’s Party, former ambassador: “According to the information I have received, despite the fact that Turkey has paid $ 1.5 billion so far for the F-16s, it is noted that Selcouk Bayraktar does not support this market. Therefore, Bayraktar is of the view that the production and development of the Kaan aircraft should be prioritized. In this context, instead of acquiring the F-16, it is alleged to want the complete deepening of co-operation in the defense industry, as well as the supply of engines for Kaan to Turkey. However, both Trump and the US Congress are alleged to insist on the sale of F-16s to Turkey, as it is an important source of revenue. Therefore, it is rumored that Bayraktar’s reluctance to acquire the F-16s has caused dissatisfaction in the US. If we do not obtain the F-16s, how will we secure the emergency modernization that is considered necessary for our air defense? “

Turkish journalists: “In the Turkish presidency some people say Fidan has turned the boss to a glider”

“Fidan undermined the narrative of the fighter”

Ismail Saimaz, journalist Sozcu TV: “A source near the presidential mansion I spoke to, reacted strongly to Fidan’s statements. He told me ‘Hakan Fidan turned the Kaan into a glider’. I was also told that Fidan’s statements and other behaviors threw a shadow in the success that Erdogan achieved during his trip to the US and put him in the spotlight. “

June Ozdemir, journalist: “I don’t know if he did it inadvertently or deliberately, but Hakan Fidan in his interview with New York referred to an issue that Turkish public opinion did not know. In the years from the government, they have a narrative. How do we produce KAAN, how we have our own fighter, how do we sell it to Indonesia and if they do not give us the F-35s we will have the kan. But Fidan’s statements undermine this narrative. Because Hakan Fidan states that we cannot pick up the KAAN engines and that we are waiting for Congress’s license for both the engines, and for the F-16s as well as the F-35s. OK, we knew about the F-35s and the F-16s. But Kaan? This is news! “

Turkish state television accuses Greece and Cyprus for cooperation with Israel

“Was the attack on Israel’s narrow partners in the Eastern Mediterranean?”

Turkish state television TRT World: “The previous decoration missions had faced Israel’s reactions and interventions. As they approached the excluded area, the pressures and interventions increased. But this time the flutter did not attacked Gaza off, but in the areas of responsibility of Israel’s closest allies. The unanswered question remains. Was this a business of Israel? Had a demonstration of power with its partners in the Mediterranean. “