The sixth day of Roula Pispirigou’s apology for the attempted murder of Georgina continued with a flurry of questions from the president.

The president asked a series of questions on matters concerning both the essence of the case and others, related to the personality of the accused and the way she perceived her relationship with her estranged husband, as can be seen from her formulations and expressions in messages he exchanged with Manos Daskalakisbut also with other persons.

The chair asked the accused about a search she made on the internet on January 17, 2022, twelve days before Georgina ended up being poisoned, according to the accusation, by her mother.

Pispirigou appears to have visited a medical publication website in the section on anesthetic drugs that included ketamine. This evidence, as well as many other searches of the defendant, resulted from the Electronic Crime Prosecution’s audit of the defendant’s electronic devices. “I was looking for chloral. I haven’t read about ketamine. I clicked on the first result that came up on google” said Roula Pispirigou in court.

As the 35-year-old stated again, she is convinced that the encephalopathy suffered by Georgina was due to the untimely intervention of Karamandanios’ anesthesiologist, whom, as she repeated, she had seen moving slowly to deal with the incident: “Everyone was saying that we are waiting for a doctor and I see him coming with a slow step and I say to Mano, “are we waiting for him?”. He didn’t come running, so to speak. I believe that my child’s encephalopathy is due to the late arrival of Mr».

During the examination, Pispirigou broke down and started shouting when she was questioned about a nurse’s claim that she had argued with Georgina while the child was in the intensive care unit. The accused exasperated said: “If this thing is possible! That is a shame somewhere! With irony and lies we don’t make ends meet! If a decision has been made for me, let’s end it here!”.

In response to the president’s persistent questions to explain why the nurses are testifying, the defendant again referred to the influence of the intensivist, head of the Children’s ICU in Rio, Andreas Iliadis.

She also said once again that she knew she was being commented on and “I entered intensive care and felt like I was playing Big Brother! What antics they filed! If my nail was red or blue and if my hair was curly or straight! They looked at me with wide eyes».

The defendant differed in relation to the position of her counsel regarding the alleged intention of Mr. Iliadis regarding Georgina’s organs. “I do not agree with my counsel’s position.

But I believe that the therapeutic hypothermia (which the child was put in when she was flown to Rio after the suspension) did harm to Georgina’s life because she did not have brain swelling and then had” he said.

The apology was also watched today by Manos Daskalakis, who at one point seemed to be very irritated by the defendant’s answers, a charge that he did not hide, as while sitting in a position for the audience he clapped his hands on his legs.

The accused was again asked to explain the communication she had with a woman, in order to mediate with an elderly woman who “he was reading prayers».

As she reported, because the mediator told her that “there can be magic in the house” he paid her 100 euros to have the elderly wish read for the child.

As the defendant has said, at that time she was so agitated that she would go the same way wherever she was told, “either to a top professor or a paperweight».