In a lawsuit for three offenses, the former head of the Corruption Prosecutor “replied” Eleni Touloupakis and former Corruption Prosecutor Christos Dzouras, in the case of what he claimed yesterday against them in the trial of former Novartis Witnesses, Constantine Frouzis.

The two prosecutors have filed against the former head of Novartis for false deposition, slanderous defamation and false misrepresentation and are calling for an autopsy procedure to be implemented.

Mr Frouzis, characterizing Mrs Touloupakis and the other prosecutors ‘Killers’ He said that the investigation of the company’s practices had called him to the Corruption Public Prosecutor’s Office where he was pressured by the prosecutor in order to “false” about the bribery of the company to politicians. He even said that he was told specific names.

In their lawsuit, The two prosecutors They cite the Supreme Court of the Judicial Council of the Supreme Court for the Novartis case, which states that the meeting of Constantine Frouzis with them was on his own initiative.

According to the lawsuit stated in the lawsuit during the meeting: ‘Mr Frouzis said that he was wrongly involved in the Novartis case that the criminal prosecution was unjust, that he had done nothing illegal and that he was available to the prosecutor’s office to testify and facilitate the investigation.“

It is emphasized in the parliament that in their affidavits for this meeting, the lawyers present, responding to the investigator about whether the corruption prosecutors have perceived their pressure to testify, in order to deposit their client against politicians.

According to the same deposits, Mrs Touloupakis did not refer to specific names of politicians, nor was her behavior blackmail, nor gave the impression that she was trying to blackmail. “

Konstantinos Frouzis has testified that he has received pressure from Mrs Touloupakis to involve politicians in the Novartis scandal during the period when the Corruption Public Prosecutor’s Office was ongoing.