SYRIZA – Dritsas: Why the government insists on involving Greece in military rivalries

by

“The major question: why does he insist on involving Greece in war, to make it an accelerating country and not a country contributing to negotiations and peace.”

“Lies, half-truths and deception”, the head of the National Defense Department of SYRIZA-PS accuses the government, Thodoris Dritsas, in a statement after the discussion of a topical question in Parliament on “Greek weapons and ammunition in Ukraine».

Mr. Dritsas states that “the Minister arrived today but in fact did not answer the critical questions, not only mine or the SYRIZA-Progressive Alliance, but all the parties and all the Greek and Greek citizens to whom the Government owes to give complete and detailed answers. What kind of weapons were sent and will be sent. What quantities. At what cost. By what procedure provided by the Greek legislation and the regulations of the Armed Forces. “What will be the consequences for the country’s defense and, of course, the major question: why does it insist on involving Greece in war, to make it an accelerating country, and not a country contributing to negotiations and peace.”

Mr. Dritsas also asks why the Greek government “chooses half-truths, lies, concealment and deception, so that the Greek people are informed when by the US Secretary of Defense, when by the Chancellor of Germany, sometimes from Ukrainian tweets, sometimes from any other improbable or possible source, but never from the responsible Government “.

He also notes that while “SYRIZA-Progressive Alliance formally requested from the Speaker of the Parliament a mandatory mandatory meeting according to article 41A of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament, a request that was also supported by the K.K.E. and from other parties, the Government and the Presidency of the Parliament refuse to implement the Rules of Procedure and to do their duty “and adds:” But the Greek people must learn to judge. “On Wednesday we are ready for the next parliamentary battle in this direction.” He also claims that “the argument of the Minister and the Government that the weapons that are sent are” stocks “or” surplus material “is completely non-existent, because the only term known to the Armed Forces is:” operationally necessary or unnecessary weapons, weapons systems and ammunition “, for which the Staffs decide alone, with detailed and documented planning and that it is included in this designation after official decisions, or is decommissioned or sold. “Finally, lies and irresponsibility for such critical issues.”

You May Also Like

Recommended for you

Immediate Peak