Military sources said that “for the issue of surveillance, justice will be done. The leader still enjoys the confidence of the prime minister and KYSEA. AGEETHA will continue its work without interruption”.
A new cycle of political confrontation opened today regarding the surveillance on the occasion of a publication of the Documento newspaper, according to which the head of the Army was the 519c target of the EYP.
Military sources said that “for the issue of surveillance, justice will be done. The leader still enjoys the confidence of the prime minister and KYSEA. AGEETHA will continue its work without interruption”.
The political conflict started on the occasion of today’s announcement by SYRIZA, in which it is stated that the prime minister “must answer today what is the reason for national security that the EYP, instead of protecting AGEETHA, monitored him”.
In particular, SYRIZA states in its announcement that “when Mr. Mitsotakis left the Parliament in order not to answer the question of Mr. Tsipras whether the EYP was monitoring the AGEETHA Mr. Floros, everyone understood why he made it up”.
“Today the Documento newspaper reveals that the Chief of the Army was the 519c target of the EYP”, he adds and emphasizes that “now everyone has realized that Mr. Mitsotakis is not only dangerous for the Republic and the Constitution, but also for national security ». SYRIZA notes that “he has to answer today: What is the reason for national security that the EYP, instead of protecting AGEETHA, monitored him?”.
In addition, he emphasizes that “the Prosecutor of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, Ms. Vlachou, also owes a corresponding answer: Did she know that she was signing the monitoring of Mr. Floros? Who gave her this order?”
Butler’s answer
“After 1974, no political body had attempted to involve the Armed Forces in the partisan confrontation,” the government spokesman said in a statement. Giannis Oikonomou And it continues:
“SYRIZA did it, faithfully following the tactic ‘Tsipras announces – Vaxevanis publishes – SYRIZA over-issues'”.
The government spokesman continued: “Relying on material channeled by dirty networks, he reached the extreme point of political dishonor – at a critical juncture for our national affairs – by attempting to create a rift between the leadership of the Armed Forces and the political leadership, including the Prime Minister .
It will not pass them, because our institutions are very strong and our people, with absolute sympathy, demand that the national and the collective remain immune from any expediency.
» At the same time, the Government and the Prime Minister had and have absolute confidence in the leadership of our Armed Forces. The Government pursues the truth because it is not afraid of it. That is why it is always with the Justice and the institutions”.
Answer by Iliopoulos
“After 1974, the only thing that is certain is that no prime minister ordered the monitoring of the National Assembly,” SYRIZA press representative Nasos Iliopoulos said in a statement.
“If Mr. Economou wants to refresh his historical knowledge, let him look back at the post-conflict years of the parastate, the K.Y.P and the subordination of the country’s national defense to dark micro-political plans. The results were tragic for the Republic and our country.
As of today, the only question is why did the Prime Minister order the monitoring of the Head of the GHETHA through the EYP?
Both he and the prosecutor Mrs. Vlachou must answer. The national security of the country requires it. Our democracy demands it.”
Read the News today and get the latest news.
Follow Skai.gr on Google News and be the first to know all the news.
I have worked in the news industry for over 10 years. I have been an author at News Bulletin 247 for the past 2 years. I mostly cover politics news. I am a highly experienced and respected journalist. I have won numerous awards for my work.
