The first and main reason for the KKE’s rejection of the bill is the commercialization of childbearing and childrearing, said KKE’s special buyer Vivi Daga and added that the introduced legislation undermines the child’s right, i.e. his social need to have bonds with mother and father.

“This need has an objective basis in the mutually complementary relationship of motherhood and fatherhood, and obviously this relationship has a social character as well, including the biological relationship between the male and female organism in the reproduction of the species,” said Mrs. Daga and underlined that the basis of the position of the KKE it is the rights of the child.

“A electoral dividing line was formed. That is to say that anyone who agrees with the bill is progressive and anyone who disagrees is with the Far Right and the Church. We understand your attempt to obscure your real motive”, said the special buyer of the KKE and accused the government that with this bill it seeks to wash away its anti-popular policy especially in the consciousness of the youth, because at the same time it is bringing back a bill that crushes every her social right, such as the private universities bill.

“It is a challenge to try to identify the scientific position of the KKE, which includes classism, with the anachronistic obscurantist position of the Church, in order to hide the conservative logic of the bill, which defends the nuclear family as a fundamental economic social unit, which you just want to extend it to other forms of symbiosis,” Vivi Daga said and wondered:

“what does the KKE, which has taken a series of initiatives against the social isolation of people based on sexual orientation or other personal characteristics of sexuality, have to do with the Church that considers homosexuality a sin? What does the KKE, which supports the equal free coexistence of two people, without economic and social coercion, have to do with its pioneering positions on the outdated institution of marriage, with the Church’s position that the civil marriage of same-sex couples contradicts the God, complementarity, man and woman and in the God-given institution of marriage?’