By Antonis Anzoletou

The divisive tendencies in Koumoundourou, the path of split without return that the party has taken, the poll collapse and of course the attitude of Kyriakos Mitsotakis yesterday towards Nico Pappa led SYRIZA to be a “spectator” of the conflict that developed between New Democracy and PASOK in the Parliament.

Has the prime minister decided to “finish” SYRIZA through the parliamentary process by discrediting it?

There are also those who argued that it was a good opportunity for Kyriakos Mitsotakis to aim his arrows at Antonis Samaras as well.

His refusal to recognize Nikos Pappa as his interlocutor angered Koumoundourou and the conflict is expected to be fierce in the coming period.

Rania Svigou wrote on social media: “the person responsible for wiretapping, the crime of Tempe, the leakage of personal data of citizens goes to great lengths to teach SYRIZA and N.Pappa lessons on parliamentarianism and protection of the state.

Even if he doesn’t like it, the official opposition is chosen by the people.” From SYRIZA, they even called on the progressive parties to rise to the occasion “and to condemn the disgrace of Mitsotakis.

His attitude does not concern only SYRIZA-PS. The discrediting of the parties by the prime minister is directly related to the elementary rules of the Republic”, they said.

As is normal, this development favored PASOK in yesterday’s debate, as it had enough space to confront the government and it is obviously something that will be repeated in the next period.

There will be many disagreements between them, as was seen both with the ASEP bill and with the amendment for the suspension of Spartan funding submitted by Nikos Androulakis.

It is no coincidence that sources from Harilaou Trikoupi reported that PASOK bore the brunt of the opposition conflict. They even noted that it was portrayed as the opposing pole and with the discussion in the Plenary the restart was underlined.

However, Nikos Androulakis, talking to journalists yesterday about whether Kyriakos Mitsotakis chooses him as an institutional interlocutor, said that you should not underestimate the opposition, keeping your distance.

As to whether this is a revival of bipartisanship, as it became known in the post-colonial period until 2012, it is too early to say.

It will depend on the course of SYRIZA and to a large extent if its parliamentary group splits in two after the polls to elect a new leader. What is certain is that the roles and possibly the geography of the Parliament changes significantly 15 months after the elections.