The government is not going to stand in the way of the Tempi pre -trial committee, government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis said, noting that “this is a proven proof that there is no cover”.

Speaking to ERT, Mr. Marinakis said that Christos Triantopoulos has responded publicly on the subject and that “We will not make a court, we will not stand in the way of the pre -trial investigation, but we will point PASOK’s request. “

Responding to the criticism that the House hid the case file, he said that when he came to the House he was announced and then additional documents arrived. “The files are public and MPs have access”he stressed.

In addition, he stood in his finding National organization To investigate accidents by saying that if the government wished to cover it would not set up an independent organization and would not staff it with staff. ‘The first one that comes out of the It is a finding that the narrative is solemnly rejected. “he pointed out characteristics. “PASOK is coming and citing the finding of an organization he did not vote for in Parliament”Mr Marinakis said characteristically.

The government spokesman responded to the attack on justice, which criticized a delay, stressing that “We do not illegally push for justice as SYRIZA did. Now that we do not push and let justice do its job, they tell us that we are delaying. “

In detail, Mr. Marinakis mentioned to ERT News: “If we could put it in titles, the tragic Tempe accident can be evaluated on three levels. The first and foremost is that it is a collective trauma, an accident that hurts the whole of society and much more the relatives of the people who lost their own people. We are not discussing this. That is why the second level is all in light and justice to decide without asterisks and without exceptions who have any responsibility. We are not discussing this. But there is also a third level, which has to do with the opposition, which is trying to get political benefits on a tragic accident and even find a political life justified, because as shown by the polls and the back they have turned around. Citizens in a sterile opposition is trying to survive politically. And unfortunately it does it on the backs of suffering people who are the relatives of the victims, but also of an angry society who seeks justice and rightly seeks justice. And it goes without saying that this must be attributed immediately. “

‘Now watch out for the discussion of the jerk There are two discussions. One discussion has to do with whether or not some manipulations were done properly or wrong handling. This will be judged by justice. No government, no government spokesman and no minister you saw and with the prime minister he will take a position in advance of something that the Justice is investigating. But in terms of concealment here, I think this touches more the Opposition tool. Now look to see all this time the government is accused of covering up. And when you talk about cover -up what do you really say? That you accuse the government of wanting to hide the culprits, this is a cover -up.

“And all this time, while we were asking the opposition to deposit a indictment for all these aspects of the Tempe crash, it did not. So the opposition is coming to do, but so far there was no question of concealment, we were not asked anything to say no and say “ah, we conceal Alpha or Beta”. So it comes after all this time that accuses us of opposition and expresses its intention to submit a proposal to set up a preliminary examination. What we say pre -trial. We are waiting for the indictment. We are waiting for the proposal. We cannot say yes or no to something that has not been deposited. We have already stated that we will not stand in the way of us and that will be another Terrible proof that there is no concealment issue. It is another thing to express a series of objections to the case and it is another thing to blame a government and a prime minister for concealment, while doing the opposite of his actions.

»As to the political extension of this movement of PASOKbecause you know, it has a big difference, it’s another thing to go out on a channel, in a speech and to say Burdish expressions such as concealmentto you blame a government and another thing a formal proposal. A formal proposal must be accompanied by a specific indictment, causal relevance. We expect all this from PASOK. We are waiting to see the content. It is a given that it is another thing our official position so that there is no question of class, concealment, and another commentary on what the indictment will say. Do not connect these two“

In addition, Pavlos Marinakis stressed “I look forward to seeing PASOK’s proposal and see how PASOK legally because from one point onwards you cannot do these procedures with a political manifesto.

It is not a political manifesto a judicial or a procedure that is a judicial nature that is the preliminary examination. So here we are waiting, we are in fact, to see what they say and how they document it. And in terms of the case file, they are also part of an unprecedented tooling, because it is a given, and the new Speaker of the House said that the case has come to the House, her arrival was announced and accusing the former Speaker of the House.[…] The case file has come, announced and what the opposition says are additional documents. It was done with all the case files of all cases in the House. The arrival of a case file is announced and when complementary documents enter the case file and are public for all Members. “