By Gifts Antoniou

There was a disorder yesterday in the wake of the decision of the Court of Justice, which deducts three Spartans, and the debate that followed if it affects the majority in Parliament, which now remains with 297 MPs.

The government, after an initial confusion caused by the interpretations, was finally chosen to leave the opinion and the decision on what is true in the relevant departments of the House. In this way it is intended not to open and maintain a scenario debate on a reduced majority, which would raise questions about the loss of the declaration of declared or leave a field of criticism of the defeat by the opposition. The House will evaluate the data and decide what, ultimately, is valid after the unprecedented situation.

The truth is that the initial positioning of the government spokesman, Paul Marinakison the subject left the field open to cultivate a series of scenarios. “The majority, then, of all Members, so the law says, from 151 is gone 149. There has been a decision in the past. For the pre -trial it takes 149 to be accepted. Where the law says, the regulation, the votes are not a majority of the Members present, but a majority of all Members, the logic says that 151 is 149. “ Mr. Marinakis said on SKAI radio.

Care, of course, to point out that “The bar is neither the 149 nor the 151, but the total of our parliamentary MPs,” But the debate caused by his first report quickly took on dimensions with public placements, estimates, statements, references to the House Regulation.

Later in the day, government sources said that there are different interpretations of the Constitution, based on all Members or all seats, of which the resulting majority are different: or 149 or 151. Finally, he ruled that he said that he said that he said that he said that the majority. “The bar for us is neither the 149 nor the 151, this will be clarified by the services of the House, but all the Members of the Parliamentary Group.”

With this option, the government seeks to rally the parliamentary group and discourage possible differentiation movements by its MPs, starting with the vote for the pre -trial pre -trial vote for Kostas Karamanlissaying that any losses could launch developments.

In Zappeion

Given that the debate is also about constitutionalists, it was a matter of time to be transferred to Zappeion, where it began yesterday and the conference of the ideas cycle for the fifty years since the 1975 Constitution. Evangelos Venizelos and Prokopis Pavlopoulos rushed to place.

“However, the whole number of MPs is 300, I do not occupy you hexapin. Although the House is left with 297 MPs, the whole number of Members is 300. Because I see tacitus consensus omnium, let’s record that we said it is 300 “, said Evangelos Venizelos.

Prokopis Pavlopoulos pointed out that “We will have a House of 297 MPs, we have never seen this again”. Following his placement used an example ‘Experimental’ as he described it. He said that at the time he was an interior minister he brought a provision voted by all 300 MPs, with the agreement of all political parties. “It was voted unanimously, not to take into account white. We thought in this way that this should be avoided at all power. This acquis we had then decided today is to be altered by this decision and to be a rule for the future, which we cannot legally foresee. “