“Instead of fixing the stadium, they made it worse”was the initial position of the lawyer and vice-president of AEK, Alexis Alexiouconcerning the responsibilities of Atromitos for the way of trying to solve the problem of the beams.
“The regulation is clear, from the moment it is reported, an objection must be made automatically. The referee is entitled, by any appropriate measure, as long as the objective measurement is met, he is entitled to make the measurements as they should”. he said initially.
“The case is over whether he pleaded or not, as to the irregularity. But you know they measured, they dug a ditch, you will see it in the video and the photos. They have dug in such a way that the tape measure is placed on the new focal line. If the ball bounced it would stop there. var would not be able to intervene. These are not rules of legal conduct rule. You can’t ditch the goal line, that’s unthinkable.” he added, showing photos.
“If the beams are cemented, it’s bad and all the matches there are invalid. If the beams do not come out because they are cemented, we are talking about criminal construction, whoever falls there we will be talking about a new Jankovic. There should be a small gap in the base to absorb the shocks, can’t blame AEK for making a mark. Instead of fixing the stadium, they made it worse. Atromitos was there at the measurements, he saw how they were done. The measurement is what was done in the first place, the measurements that were done made the playing field completely dangerous for the matches to take place.
What is the instrument of crime measure to be surrendered? There was a rush to some members of the super league to serve a document, the purpose was one, to serve the Atromitos with the issuance of a document. I heard from Atromitos that it is not the fault of Atromitos but I did not hear why there were no spare beams. If the problematic beams were there and could be removed, the problem would have been solved.
To hear here that there was a tremendous burden on the subsoil, there was subsidence. Is he burdened because it was snowing? If sit-downs were caused so easily there would be no matches in England and Scandinavia. Unfortunately, Mr. President, you do not have the possibility to bypass the referee’s assessment, the irregularity found, and all that remains is to establish whether Atromitos, or AEK was responsible for the irregularity of the playing field. The competitive odds were on AEK’s side, there was no reason to postpone the match, AEK said “make them play”. We didn’t tell them to dig. For us it is a clear case, Atromitos has full responsibility for the state of the field, there is no fault, nor fraudulent behavior of the referee”.
Follow News Bulletin 247 on Google News to be the first to learn the latest news .
I am currently a news writer for News Bulletin247 where I mostly cover sports news. I have always been interested in writing and it is something I am very passionate about. In my spare time, I enjoy reading and spending time with my family and friends.
