Official position for holding the derby with Olympic in a full “Karaiskaki” was taken by PAOK.
The “two-headed man of the North” speaks of flexible interpretation of the regulations and wonders if the correct she is the one who did today the Appeals Committee or the one held last year Olympiacos-Panathinaikos for the play-offs.
The relative announcement specifically states:
“THE fixed our position is that the matches of the Greek championship must be played in front of people and full stadiums and therefore it is most welcome its possible conduct Olympiacos-PAOK of Sunday with fans.
However, because flexible interpretation of regulations and the momentary shift of opinion as they like of each group, they bring a feeling injustice and inequality to the public, with the prospect of abnormal reactions on the pitches growing, as well as the possibility of new punishments, it is necessary to clarify by the Emergency Committee of the EPO (as the only competent after the Executive Committee, which cannot be immediately convened) the following:
Which interpretation of the same (as of 2020) regulation is correct; The one being used for the first time now by Olympiakos, or last year’s -of the same team- which drove the crucial to win the championship Olympiacos-Panathinaikos to be held without fans?
What is changed and interpreted different the same regulation today both from the League that has same administration and same legal service with a few months before, as well as from Olympiakos with the same administrative and legal composition?
We asked for me letter us at the EPO an immediate clarification that it is necessary and it will be o guide of what will happen in the future in similar punishments and how effective and deterrent they will be.”
Source: Sport Fm
I am currently a news writer for News Bulletin247 where I mostly cover sports news. I have always been interested in writing and it is something I am very passionate about. In my spare time, I enjoy reading and spending time with my family and friends.
