Levadiakos issued a statement Analysis of arbitration decisions of its 25th match Stoiximan Super League from KED/EPO.
THE Paulo Valeriewho commented this time the controversial phases on behalf of the Commission said that the penalty was rightly given through which Atromitos escaped With the victory from Boeotia.
The “Greens” passed on the counterattack, stressing that Stefan Lanua-maybe named him-became a reticulant, reminding how he had evaluated the Moukoudi phase in Levadiakos-AEK (which was VAR Evangelou).
In detail the announcement
It is not surprising to us that the wrong decisions himself is forced to justify them. It’s not the first to do it and becomes a reticulant!
We cannot forget, after all, the times when the same man was watching the ball hitting the leg rather than in the hand, in the phase below.
And a few months later he saw the ball hit in his hand and not on the leg.
For history, he can be informed about the Arbitration Regulation in the world’s top league, the Premier League, but also in the Italian Serie A, where it is explicitly stated that:
“A very clear diversion that results in a significant change in the direction of the ball should be more weighty on the hand evaluation when a hand -in -hand infringement is examined.”
Except, if in the Greek championship the arbitration regulation operates with a … ring, depending on whether the days are monasteries or scales.
Source: Sport Fm
I am currently a news writer for News Bulletin247 where I mostly cover sports news. I have always been interested in writing and it is something I am very passionate about. In my spare time, I enjoy reading and spending time with my family and friends.
