Following the announcement, in which Panathinaikos expresses his strong complaints about the arbitration in yesterday’s match at the SEF with Olympic“Green” OEM issued news, This time against Nova for the derby transmission!
“Why do you need to be treated with mischievous and concealment? They can no longer see our eyes and others listen to our ears …“, Says Panathinaikos among other things and concludes expressing His annoyance on the shots, which Nova gave to the other channels, from which the phases for which the “greens” complain about.
The announcement of the Panathinaikos Aktor:
As a Panathinaikos Aktor we are wondering if there is something we could comment on in yesterday’s relaying match with OEM Olympiakos from the Nova subscription channel that has not already been highlighted by its millions of viewers.
Every employee is judged for the outcome of the work he produces daily. A journalist with a unique debt describing and commenting on what he sees with his eyes is mainly accountable to the average viewer waiting for him a objective and spherical descriptionsuch that not to offend his intelligence and not make him wonder if he watches the same match as his commentator.
Last night we watched Another bad broadcast during which the commentators either did not want or could not (we do not know what is worse) to respond to their role and to point out critical phases, to make mistakes or at least simply transfer to the public and paying public, to watch them. Nothing. Errors on errors, ophthalmic injustices, dietary decisions were passed through our screen as non -born.
It is debt that is paid to provide these valuable services, to describe the true image we all see to viewers and responsibly. Why should we constantly compromise with descriptions that are unable or do not want to cope with the elementary? Why do you need to be treated with mischievous and concealment? They can no longer see our eyes and others listen to our ears …
Finally -and just as important. Who is responsible for the paid channel for the shots shared with other media to play everywhere? How can it not include critical phases in these plans strongly disputed by our OEM, which thus lacks the ability to hear it with evidence? How can it be accepted to have snapshots that miss the footsteps of the Olympic player at the most decisive moment of the match? How will the other journalists in their television reports be able to highlight our argument? It is unacceptable at 2025 to have to talk about the obvious.
We immediately expect the answers to our absolutely reasonable questions.
Source: Sport Fm
I am currently a news writer for News Bulletin247 where I mostly cover sports news. I have always been interested in writing and it is something I am very passionate about. In my spare time, I enjoy reading and spending time with my family and friends.
