President Donald Trump’s global tariff “attack” may slow down, but will not stop by court rulings, the Reutersciting statements of commerce and legal analysts.

The application of “payroll” customs duties at least 10% to all imported products in the US and up to 50% depending on the country of origin can simply be based on different contexts, articles or articles or articles or articles or articles or articles or articles ‘Windows’ laws or move to other legal authorities, legalizing the movements of the US president.

At present, an urgent suspension of the Court of Justice Court of Justice against Trump’s duties under the law on international economic emergency (a law aimed at addressing threats during national emergency). will keep them in forcewhile maintaining their influence on commercial partners.

According to the Dan Whitsa lawyer and a commercially -owned trade in Ohio, “The Trump government has a number of options, including the recasting of executive decrees to be included in CIT’s opinion.”

The Manhattan -based trade court decided late on Wednesday that Trump exceeded his legal power, imposing punitive duties based on his IEEPAof a 1977 law that has been used mainly for sanctions.

The main advantage of IEEPA It is its speed and its seemingly wide scope, which matched Trump’s desire to move quickly to impose duties within a few weeks of his swearing -in on January 20 through the signing of executive decrees.

The White House Commerce Advisor, Peter Navarrotold reporters that if the IEEPA Eventually becoming unavailable, the government could impose duties based on the article 301 (About unfair commercial practices used to impose tariffs on Chinese imports in 2018 and 2019) or article 232 (on national security used for duties in steel, aluminum and cars), or of the article 338 of the duty of duties (1930) and the article 122 of the Trade Act (1971).

Articles 122 and 338

The article 122 It allows Trump to impose 15% duties for 150 days to limit imports and address balance of payment problems or prevent significant devaluation of the dollar, but would require Congress to extend them after 150 days.

The law was adopted by the president Richard M. Nixon In 1971, as a result of the imposition of a world duty of 10% under previous law. Legal experts had reported Nixon’s law as a possible equivalent to IEEPA to support Trump’s duties.

“The general picture is that we have a very strong matter with IEEpa, but if the court does not validate its use, we will just do some other things. So nothing has really changed ‘, said the Navar on Bloomberg TV.

In the announcement of global duties for ‘Day of Liberation’ of Trump on April 2, 10-50%, some experts expected that the US president would use the 85-year-old article 338 to support them. The law against commercial discrimination has not previously been relying on, and has largely disappeared from public records since the 1940s.

Would allow Trump to impose additional duties from 15% to 50% on goods from any country discriminating against US products in a way that puts American goods in ‘Disadvantaged position’ compared to imports from other countries.

THE Whitso He said Trump could also address Congress for more duties on tariffs, which could make the duties more legally sustainable.

OR Kelly if soformer Trump Trade Advisor during his first term and partner in his law firm Gabbi In Washington, he said Trump “He is not going to abandon his tariff strategy.”

“I think there is plenty of other elements that the government could use to justify similar, if not the same, measures.”said the SA. “So when I talk to clients or governments, I think the safest thing I can say is that these duties will continue to exist in some form, if not with the same.”