With tensions on the process and first placements for the attitude of parties by parliamentary representatives to start the debate on the establishment of an Inquiry Committee “which will investigate all issues that have arisen on the operation of the Payment and Control Organization for Community Aid and Guarantee Aid (OPEC) Aid to be a reliable, effective and fair mechanism for all producers in the country. “

The parliamentary representatives of PASOK-KINAL, SYRIZA, KKE, Victory disagreed with the preceding discussion of the proposal to set up OPEKEPE Committee on the discussion of the two proposals submitted by PASOK and SYRIZA-New Left to set up a preliminary committee against the two former Rural Development Ministers Makis Voridis and Lefteris Voridis.

Her parliamentary representative ND Notis Mitarakis rejected the objections by saying that “it is perfectly reasonable, first to discuss the major, the overall issue of OPECEPE that concerns society and has a timelessness and many aspects that we need to see and tomorrow will discuss the opposition’s proposals to set up a preliminary committee.”

Mr Mitarakis reasonably attributed the concern that SYRIZA has had in the establishment of the Inquiry Committee “as the technical solution was signed for days, it was allowed to grant grants to breeders who had no animal capital. In something that came afterwards, and the PASOK that we see its own executives resign because they are involved in the issue of agricultural grants. ” The parliamentary spokesman said that “the issue of OPEKEPE is very essential and the government’s intention is to fall for plenty of light, from the beginning of this case that has cost Greek society over time. The aim is to find permanent structural solutions so that the 650,000 farmers and breeders who receive grants from OPEKEPE every year to continue to receive them with transparency. Recover amounts paid illegally. ” On the subject of the case file, Mr Mitarakis said that “tomorrow we will discuss it in detail” and observed that “the case file has come to Parliament without delay, without evaluation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. We will judge the substantive case file, we will evaluate it in accordance with the Constitution and the CTB and our position is clear: from the case file, as it has come to Parliament, there is not sufficient evidence of political responsibility. “

Earlier, his parliamentary representative PASOK – KINAL, Dimitris Mantzos described the process as “distorted” the process of discussing the Establishment of an Inquiry Committee on OPECEPE from discussing the proposals for a preliminary committee, talking about a “anti -parliamentary process and at the expense of the public interest”. The series said “it is not determined in accordance with the Houses of the Grand Maximus but based on the protocol of the Speaker of the House”. The two requests for setting up a preliminary committee filed, said Mr Mantzos, “are not urgent and urgent because they are in a case -by -case file for a European prosecutor or by risk of limitations of offenses but are also the order of things.” He blamed the majority of the ND that with the proposition of the establishment of the Inquiry Committee it is “to blur the waters and say that the setting up of the preliminary committee is going on and he says this to the European Union”. PASOK -KINAL parliamentary spokesman said this scandal belongs to you and exposes our country.

Parliament, he said, should have followed the correct order that it has those few democratic, parliamentary reflexes imposed by the Constitution and the oath we have given. ” And he added that the opposition’s demands were preceded by the proposal for an Inquiry Committee.

His parliamentary representative SYRIZA Christos Giannoulis, disagreeing with the process, he said that “the preliminary committee shows the path of honesty, the examination of the way of concealment, opacity and corruption.” He stressed that the proposition of the establishment of an Inquiry Committee by the debate on a preliminary committee “shows the meaning and magnitude of the government’s political deduction and moral degeneration”. He argued that “the debate of the two proposals for setting up a preliminary committee should have been qualified on the basis of the massive case file that has come to the House and shows the magnitude of corruption, opacity and scandals.”

Mr Giannoulis emphasized that the government majority “follows the standards of your policies, which are a shame and a stigma for parliamentary democracy”. His parliamentary representative SYRIZA noted that “in the case file there is a wealth of evidence to lead to the truth” and added that “the preceding setting up an Inquiry Committee, which by the majority rule of which you abuse against the rights of minorities is a significant moral and political deduction. It puts on the sidelines, in essence, it is stuck, the investigation of the elements “and called on” even at the last moment, because it is also anti -parliamentary, to precede the investigation of the examination, to overthrow this chronological order “. Mr Giannoulis, however, made it clear that “we will be here. We will participate throughout the process. We will not give anyone the right to say that we have been deserted and hidden or leaving the room, as the New Democracy will do tomorrow, perhaps today, if it secures enough cards for voting in the evening “and ended up in the ND,” you are in disguise, you are all over.

His parliamentary representative KKE Nikos Karathanasopoulos said that “with this particular ND choice, the KKE disagrees and will not legitimize it” as “while there is a specific case file on the OPECEPE scandal the government chooses to throw the ball into the platform … with the proposal it submits today to the constitution”. This is what Mr Karathanasopoulos said is “a government choice with multiple goals: to conceal responsibilities, policies and not. To act as a washing machine for the possible political responsibilities of its specific ministers. To obscure the fact that the womb of all these scandals produced and reproduced is the system of profit in every way even with political interventions “, noting that in the case of OPECEPE” the fertilizer for these scandals and sepsis itself is the Community agricultural policy itself and the way in which they pay. “

Her parliamentary representative Victory Nikos Brettos said that “arguing some political power why today’s proposal should be withdrawn is futile as there is a government majority that writes in its old shoes of every memorandum and every case file that comes for the responsibility of ministers in the House.” The ND, he said, “does not count the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. The EU only recognizes it when it has to get money to do jobs. ” What needs to be done, according to him, is “the establishment of a preliminary committee, if the government wanted to know something he did not know, but because they know them in Maximus after he created it, so he is moving forward with the Inquiry Committee” and said “we will be here today.”

Her parliamentary representative Sauce Alexander Kazamias emphasized that “we disagree with the procedure chosen for this debate, we also disagree with the limitations set at speech times and Members’ interventions. We believe that they reflect the intolerance of the majority of the ND towards the opposition and the opposition “and added:” We consider this process unacceptable “to propose the establishment of the Inquiry Committee, and the goal, as the two, not to protect the two ministers”. Mr. Kazamias also referred to the persecution of political leaders, such as Zoe Konstantopoulou, for their participation in agricultural mobilizations.