Karalis: “What do the football rules say about the Amrabad phase”

The football rules, which – as he emphasizes – are not written down second yellow for hand on Nordin Amrabat quoted by Yannis Karalis. Her communications consultant PAE AEK responds to the protests for altering the result in yesterday’s derby with Panathinaikos, while expressing his doubts about the last phase of the match with penalty demanded by the home team.

In detail, the post of Yannis Karalis on social media:

THE RULES OF FOOTBALL 22/23

RULE 12: Fouls and Misbehavior (page 104)

“remarks (yellow cards) for unsportsmanlike conduct:

*plays the ball with the hand with the intention of affecting or stopping an IMPROPER ATTACK

*plays the ball with his hand in an ATTEMPT TO SCORE A GOAL (whether the attempt is successful or not) or in an unsuccessful attempt to PREVENT A GOAL”.

What of these happened in Kheri-Amrabad?

As for the tackle, ball first – opponent (which was NOT a danger to the opponent) I don’t even comment on it.

PS “Penalty – Hatjisafi hand” they ask. Well, of course. They learned from the 1st penalty in Leoforo: push Hadjisafi and he doesn’t run… chestnut. You will also get a penalty-gift!!!!

P.c1 For the yellow card on Brignoli after… 10 comments for… DELAY, will you say something “lights”?

Y.c2 Palaios (at 100′), finds the ball. But NOBODY forbids Araujo to shoot afterwards. And there (after he shoots) Palasios finds him. “No penalty”? OK, but WITHOUT VAR?????

Check out this Instagram post.

This post was shared by Yannis Karalis (@john_karalis.jk)